27 February 2020

BIS: Benchmark rate reforms

The BCBS fully supports the global efforts to strengthen the robustness and reliability of existing inter-bank offered rates (IBORs) and promote the development of alternative reference rates.

In doing so, they should maintain a close dialogue with their supervisory authorities regarding their plans and transition progress, including impediments that may be identified. In this regard, as the London inter-bank offered rate (LIBOR) is not expected to exist past year-end 2021, market participants should consider carefully the economic, legal and reputational risks associated with continuing to write new contracts based on LIBOR. Public authorities may also wish to consider the actions they can take to help ensure a smooth transition.

In cases where banks continue to use IBORs, the Basel Committee encourages them to include in their contracts robust fallback language that determines how the replacement of a discontinued reference rate would be handled. Banks should also plan carefully to ensure that internally developed and vendor-provided systems and services that they use are prepared fully to accommodate the alternative reference rates.

Updating existing contracts to include fallback language, or directly adjusting contracts to reference a new benchmark rate, may trigger a reassessment of the instrument under prevailing accounting standards. Any revaluation or reclassification of assets or liabilities that result from such a reassessment of contracts could have various impacts on the financial statements of banks. As such, the Committee welcomes the work of accounting standard setters to develop guidance that will address the accounting effects on financial reporting from the transition to the alternative reference rates and looks forward to a timely finalisation of these efforts.

Regarding capital instruments, an amendment to their contractual terms could potentially trigger a reassessment of their eligibility as regulatory capital in some jurisdictions. A reassessment could result in an existing capital instrument being treated as a new instrument. This in turn could result in it breaching the minimum maturity and call date requirements that apply to capital instruments within the Basel Framework. Existing capital instruments issued under Basel II that are being phased out could also fail to meet eligibility requirements if they are treated as new instruments. The Committee is clarifying through this newsletter that, under the Basel Framework, amendments to capital instruments pursued solely for the purpose of implementing benchmark rate reforms will not result in them being treated as new instruments for the purpose of assessing the minimum maturity and call date requirements or affect their eligibility for transitional arrangements of Basel III.

Aside from contract changes, banks should consider what adjustments to their risk management frameworks will be necessary to take account of the transition to the alternative reference rates. Banks that use internal models for regulatory capital purposes should consider how they will adapts their models.

The Committee is continuing to monitor and assess issues related to benchmark reforms, and during the course of this year banks should expect greater supervisory scrutiny of their preparations and contingency planning.

Full information on BIS

© BIS - Bank for International Settlements