Across the globe, economies have been hit hard and fast by COVID-19. This column explores the effect of the pandemic on US banks’ health and their ability to support the economy with lending, using a novel measure to gauge banks’ exposure to COVID-19 and lockdown measures.
The findings suggest that banks are catching coronavirus, although the effect is not so obvious from bank balance sheets given the easing of regulatory requirements on loan classification and provisioning. Exposure to COVID has led to an increase in lending to support the economy, but driven by government support programmes, as well as a tightening in loan conditionality.
Across the globe, economies have been hit hard and fast by COVID-19
(IMF 2021). In the US, unemployment spiked in the first half of 2020 at
an unprecedented speed. While such a shock is unlikely to leave banks
unaffected, equity buffers have improved significantly since the 2007
financial crisis, and monetary and regulatory policy responses were
swift and radical to strengthen the resilience of the financial system
(Feyen et al. 2020). In addition, governments stepped in to support the
real economy, which indirectly benefitted banks.
What has been the effect of the pandemic on banks’ health and their
ability to support the economy with lending? In recent work, we explore
if and how US banks’ health has been affected and if there have been
changes in lending growth, including in reaction to government support
programmes, and in loan conditionality (Beck and Keil 2021).
The US offers a unique laboratory to test the impact of the pandemic
and policy reactions. COVID-19 outbreaks were initially concentrated in
urban centres on both coasts before the pandemic moved Mid-West and
ultimately into the South and Southwest. Similarly, state and county
governments across the US have shown quite some variation in lockdown
policies. Given the variation in regional exposure of banks, different
banks were affected to a different degree by the pandemic as well as at
different points in time. This allows us to not only document average
trends across banks but also link geographic exposure of banks to
pandemic and lockdown measures to banks’ performance.
Granular data on COVID-19 and lockdown policies
We capture exposure to the pandemic by COVID-19 related deaths per
100,000, based on data from the New York Times, except for the five
counties that form New York City, which the New York Times sums up into
one metropolitan aggregate. For consistency we use CDC data for these
counties. To capture lockdown policies, we use the non-pharmaceutical
intervention (NPI) index from Olivier Lejeune.1 The NPI index
is defined on the state level (there is little to no variation within
states), ranging from 0 (no or few containment measures in place) to 6
(harsh lockdown where residents are not allowed to come out of their
home) and is computed as the arithmetic average of all days in a
quarter.
While there is a high correlation (0.67) between COVID deaths and the
NPI index, we find independent effects of pandemic incidence and
lockdown policies on unemployment rates across counties and over time.
Measuring banks’ exposure to COVID
We introduce a novel measure to gauge banks’ exposure to COVID-19 and
lockdown measures using data on bank branch deposit distributions.
Specifically, we use the 2019 bank branch deposit shares in total bank
deposits as weights for each county and then – using county-level
COVID-19 death rates per capita and a lockdown index – calculate
bank-quarter specific measures of COVID-19 and lockdown exposure. We
illustrate this idea visually with the examples of Citibank and Zions
Bancorp in Q2 2020 in Figure 1. Citi branches (solid red dots) are
concentrated in city centres, with a particularly heavy exposure to the
New York City metropolitan area – the early epicentre of the US
pandemic. Zions (hollow blue circles) is a counter example, operating a
relatively dispersed network of locations across the western US with a
presence in rural areas and cities less affected by COVID in the first
half of 2020. Computed on the bases of new Q2 deaths, this exposure
amounts to 67 for Citibank and 13 for Zions....
more at Vox
© VoxEU.org
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article