They believe the dialogue within a firm presented by the guidelines will support strategic planning and capital management. Their response also reflects the strong view that stress testing should be seen as an enabler for further regulatory discussions along a “comply or explain” basis.
AFME, the BBA and
ISDA responded to the CEBS draft revised guidelines on
Technical Aspects of Stress Testing under the Supervisory Review Process.
The response supports many elements of the proposed guidance and finds the principles “highly useful.” As the draft guidance provides a framework for promoting dialogue within a firm, the response believes the dialogue will support strategic planning and capital management.
The response also reflects the strong view that stress testing should be seen as an enabler for further regulatory discussions along a “comply or explain” basis.
© CEBS - Committee of European Banking Supervisors
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article