EU court rejects claims from some shareholders and creditors; Reservations from experts do not mean valuation was not fair; Rescue deal must be seen as "justified and proportionate"
Europe's
second-highest court on Wednesday dismissed claims by shareholders and
creditors over losses they suffered in the 2017 rescue of Spain's Banco
Popular, saying the deal was the best option in the circumstances.
The
European Union's Single Resolution Board (SRB), set up to limit the
cost to taxpayers from failing banks, orchestrated an overnight rescue
of Popular in June 2017, with shareholders and some bondholders taking
losses as it was sold for a nominal one euro to larger Spanish rival
Santander (SAN.MC).
Spanish
and EU authorities hailed the case as a successful first test of
so-called bail-in rules, where investors and creditors bear much of the
cost of a bank rescue.
But
more than 40 major shareholders, among them Mexican investor Antonio
del Valle, and junior bondholders affected by the deal filed claims
against the SRB and European Commission, arguing the bank was not
necessarily on the verge of collapse.
In
its ruling, however, the European General Court said Popular was
"failing or was likely to fail and that there were no alternative
measures capable of preventing that situation."
Del Valle was not immediately available for comment through Mexican lender BX+, where he is honorary member of the board.
Among
the bondholders that filed the lawsuit were Algebris and Anchorage
Capital Group. Law firm Quinn Emanuel, which represented them, was not
immediately available for comment.
These
investors had sought the annulment of the SRB's decision to wind down
Popular, alleging European institutions had failed to undertake a proper
and independent valuation prior to the decision.
The
court said on Wednesday that, given the time constraints and available
information, some uncertainties and estimates were inherent in any
provisional valuation, but the reservations expressed by an expert who
carried out that valuation did not mean it was not "fair, prudent and
realistic".
It
also said the decision to convert Popular's capital instruments in the
resolution scheme "did not constitute an excessive and intolerable
interference", and must be regarded as a "justified and proportionate"
restriction to property.
Popular
had a stock market value of around 1.3 billion euros on the day it was
bailed out. Some 1.9 billion euros worth of subordinated and convertible
bonds were also wiped out.
The
ruling comes roughly a month after the EU's highest court, the European
Court of Justice (ECJ), said Banco Popular shareholders who took part
in its capital increase in 2016 were not entitled to compensation for
losses. read more
The latest ruling can be appealed before the ECJ within two months and 10 days of notification of the decision.
Reuters
© Reuters
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article