Jean-Yves Jacquelin, Chair of the EPC SEPA Payment Schemes Working Group, writes that facilitating the transition of market participants to harmonised SEPA payment schemes and technical standards requires allowing for a degree of flexibility. This blog provides an overview of variations possible.
EU integration rarely follows the fastest possible trajectory, but relies on incremental progress over time. More than 14 years of the
SEPA in the making, based on several EU legislative interventions aimed at promoting the harmonisation of the euro payments market, is a prime example in this context.
Up to this point it has been recognised that facilitating the transition of millions of market participants to harmonised
SEPA payment schemes and technical standards requires allowing for a degree of flexibility. The
SEPA Credit Transfer (SCT) and
SEPA Direct Debit (SDD) Schemes, developed by the European Payments Council (EPC) in close dialogue with all stakeholders, also reflect this fact.
Dialogue with stakeholders across
SEPA frequently demonstrates that the requirements of bank customers, with regard to the
SEPA payment schemes, differ widely across and within the various customer segments and
SEPA countries. The
SCT and
SDD Schemes, therefore, today include mandatory elements to be observed by all adhering payment service providers (PSPs) as well as optional elements allowing PSPs to offer specific features in response to market demand.
At the same time, the EU lawmaker has provided EU Member States with options to derogate, during a transitional period, from certain provisions included with the ‘Regulation (EU) No 260/2012 establishing technical and business requirements for credit transfers and direct debits in euro’, which sets out
SEPA compliance requirements applicable to euro credit transfers and direct debits.
In this blog, Jean-Yves Jacquelin, Chair of the
EPC SEPA Payment Schemes Working Group, provides an overview of variations possible in
SEPA today. With migration to
SCT and
SDD in the euro area nearly complete, the question is whether a majority of stakeholders is willing to relinquish – at least in the mid-term – any (or even all) of the options, exceptions, exemptions and variations currently available in favour of further harmonisation.
© EPC
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article