In reviewing the evidence so far regarding the impact of commodity trading, speculation, and index investment on price volatility, the report finds that the evidence for the prosecution does not seem particularly compelling at this point.
      
    
    
      The paper’s conclusion is to agree with the World Bank president who has said that the answer to food price volatility is not to prosecute or block markets, but to use them better. In the author’s view, one sensible use of financial engineering is for hedging volatile food price risk with appropriate commodity derivatives contracts.
The position paper reveals that French President Nicolas Sarkozy’s view that “the financialisation of agriculture markets… is a contributory factor in price volatility…” is contradicted by Dr Pierre Jacquet, Chief Economist of the Agence Française de Développement, who notes that a number of market-based solutions could potentially help developing countries better manage commodity price volatility, including increasing access to risk-hedging instruments.
This new position paper echoes previous EDHEC-Risk Institute research results, which were the subject of an open letter to European Commissioner Michel Barnier in September 20101. These results find no evidence that speculation is a cause of high levels of volatility in commodity prices. The latter position, which is supported by the French presidency of the G20, is contradicted both by EDHEC-Risk Institute’s own work and also by two empirical studies conducted by the two main international economic organisations, the 
IMF  and the OECD.
Full paper 
      
      
      
      
        © EDHEC
     
      
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article