The full Basel III implementation would result in an average increase of 13.7% on the current Tier 1 minimum required capital of EU banks. To comply with the new framework, EU banks would need EUR 3.1 billion of additional Tier 1 capital.
      
    
    
      
    The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today its 
regular monitoring Report of the full implementation, in 2028, of the 
final Basel III reforms in the EU. According to this assessment, which 
is carried out using the same methodology as the one applied by the 
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), the full Basel III 
implementation would result in an average increase of 13.7% on the 
current Tier 1 minimum required capital of EU banks. To comply with the 
new framework, EU banks would need EUR 3.1 billion of additional Tier 1 
capital. The overall impact reflects the economic impact of the Covid-19
 pandemic on participating banks that materialised up to December 2020, 
the reference date of this Report.  
Overview of the results
Overall, the results of the Basel III capital monitoring exercise 
show that European banks' minimum Tier 1 capital requirement would 
increase by 13.7% at the full implementation date in 2028, without 
taking into account EU-specific adjustments. Excluding the leverage 
ratio contribution, the impact of the reforms is 18%, of which the 
leading factors are the output floor (7.1%) and credit risk (5.1%).  The
 minimum Tier 1 capital requirement for large and internationally active
 banks (Group 1) would increase by 14.4%. The respective requirement for
 the global systemically important institutions (subset of Group 1) and 
that of Group 2 banks would raise by 22.7% and 8.1%, respectively.    
Change
 in total Tier 1 minimum required capital (MRC), as a percentage of the 
overall current Tier 1 MRC, due to the full implementation of Basel III 
(2028) (weighted averages, in %) 
	
		
			| Bank group | Credit risk | Market risk | CVA | Op Risk | Output floor | Other Pillar 1 | Total risk-based | Revised LR | Total | 
	
	
		
			| 
 
 | SA | IRB | Securitisation | CCPs | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
 
 | 
		
			| All banks | 2.3 | 2.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 2.2 | 3.8 | 7.1 | -0.2 | 18.0 | -4.3 | 13.7 | 
		
			| Group 1 | 1.7 | 2.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 2.4 | 4.1 | 7.7 | -0.2 | 18.4 | -4.0 | 14.4 | 
		
			| Of which: G-SIIs | 1.9 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 3.0 | 6.1 | 7.4 | -0.3 | 22.0 | 0.7 | 22.7 | 
		
			| Group 2 | 6.8 | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 1.4 | 2.2 | 0.0 | 15.0 | -6.9 | 8.1 | 
	
Source: EBA Quantitative Impact Study (QIS) data (December 2020), sample: 99 banks
Notes to the editors
- The methodology applied differs from the one used in the separate 
Calls for Advice from the EU Commission to assess the impact of Basel 
reforms on EU banks and which is used as the basis for the EU Commission
 legislative proposals on the implementation of Basel III in the EU.
- The Basel III monitoring Report assesses the impact on EU banks of 
the final revisions of credit risk, split into four sub-categories, 
operational risk, and leverage ratio frameworks, as well as of the 
introduction of the aggregate output floor. It also quantifies the 
impact of the new standards for market risk (FRTB) and credit valuation 
adjustments (CVA).
- The cumulative impact analysis of the Basel III monitoring exercise
 report uses a total sample of 99 banks.The Basel III capital monitoring
 report shows the results separately for Group 1 and Group 2 banks. 
Group 1 banks are those with Tier 1 capital in excess of EUR 3 billion 
and are internationally active. All other banks are categorised as Group
 2 banks.
- For three Global Systemically Important institutions, which are 
considered outliers owing to overly conservative assumptions under the 
revised market risk framework, the results showing ‘reduced estimation 
bias’ assume zero change between the current and the revised market risk
 framework. According to the “conservative estimation”, based on the 
original conservative assumptions, the total impact would be 13.9%, with
 a total risk-based impact of 19.1% and market risk impact of 1.5%.
Together with the Report, an interactive tool
 showing the main results is made available for analytical purposes. The
 official figures and conclusions are the ones presented in the public 
Basel III monitoring Report. Therefore, any interpretation based on the 
data provided within the visualisation tool must be taken with caution. 
   
  
    
          Documents
      
    
    
          links
      
EBA
      
      
      
      
        © EBA
     
      
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
 
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article