For the 2020 SREP cycle, we adopted a pragmatic approach given the outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. We focused on how banks were handling the challenges arising from the crisis and kept most Pillar 2 requirements (P2R) and Pillar 2 guidance (P2G) stable. 
      
    
    
      Welcome to our press conference on the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process – SREP  for short. 
 
 In 2021 we returned to a full SREP  assessment. I will outline the 
results by concentrating on four main topics. First, the resilience that
 banks have shown. Second, the risks that could still materialise from 
the COVID-19 fallout. Third, the structural challenges which predate the
 pandemic but continue to weigh on banks. And fourth, risks that are 
still emerging but already require immediate action. 
 A resilient banking sector navigating through an uncertain macroeconomic environment 
 When I spoke at last year’s press conference, economic forecasts 
projected that output would return to pre-pandemic levels in mid-2022, 
following the record drop in activity during the first phase of the 
pandemic. Thankfully, the recovery was even faster than expected. Output
 has already rebounded to pre-pandemic levels, and economic growth is 
projected to remain strong over the next three years. But there is still
 uncertainty about how the pandemic will evolve, mostly owing to the 
potential spread of new virus variants, and supply chain disruptions are
 weighing on trade and overall economic activity...
much more + charts at SSM
      
      
      
      
        © ECB - European Central Bank
     
      
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
 
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article