The full Basel III implementation would result in an average increase of 13.7% on the current Tier 1 minimum required capital of EU banks. To comply with the new framework, EU banks would need EUR 3.1 billion of additional Tier 1 capital.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) published today its
regular monitoring Report of the full implementation, in 2028, of the
final Basel III reforms in the EU. According to this assessment, which
is carried out using the same methodology as the one applied by the
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS), the full Basel III
implementation would result in an average increase of 13.7% on the
current Tier 1 minimum required capital of EU banks. To comply with the
new framework, EU banks would need EUR 3.1 billion of additional Tier 1
capital. The overall impact reflects the economic impact of the Covid-19
pandemic on participating banks that materialised up to December 2020,
the reference date of this Report.
Overview of the results
Overall, the results of the Basel III capital monitoring exercise
show that European banks' minimum Tier 1 capital requirement would
increase by 13.7% at the full implementation date in 2028, without
taking into account EU-specific adjustments. Excluding the leverage
ratio contribution, the impact of the reforms is 18%, of which the
leading factors are the output floor (7.1%) and credit risk (5.1%). The
minimum Tier 1 capital requirement for large and internationally active
banks (Group 1) would increase by 14.4%. The respective requirement for
the global systemically important institutions (subset of Group 1) and
that of Group 2 banks would raise by 22.7% and 8.1%, respectively.
Change
in total Tier 1 minimum required capital (MRC), as a percentage of the
overall current Tier 1 MRC, due to the full implementation of Basel III
(2028) (weighted averages, in %)
Bank group
|
Credit risk
|
Market risk
|
CVA
|
Op
Risk
|
Output floor
|
Other Pillar 1
|
Total risk-based
|
Revised LR
|
Total
|
|
SA
|
IRB
|
Securitisation
|
CCPs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All banks
|
2.3
|
2.8
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.2
|
2.2
|
3.8
|
7.1
|
-0.2
|
18.0
|
-4.3
|
13.7
|
Group 1
|
1.7
|
2.7
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
2.4
|
4.1
|
7.7
|
-0.2
|
18.4
|
-4.0
|
14.4
|
Of which: G-SIIs
|
1.9
|
3.8
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.1
|
3.0
|
6.1
|
7.4
|
-0.3
|
22.0
|
0.7
|
22.7
|
Group 2
|
6.8
|
3.6
|
0.0
|
0.0
|
0.4
|
0.7
|
1.4
|
2.2
|
0.0
|
15.0
|
-6.9
|
8.1
|
Source: EBA Quantitative Impact Study (QIS) data (December 2020), sample: 99 banks
Notes to the editors
- The methodology applied differs from the one used in the separate
Calls for Advice from the EU Commission to assess the impact of Basel
reforms on EU banks and which is used as the basis for the EU Commission
legislative proposals on the implementation of Basel III in the EU.
- The Basel III monitoring Report assesses the impact on EU banks of
the final revisions of credit risk, split into four sub-categories,
operational risk, and leverage ratio frameworks, as well as of the
introduction of the aggregate output floor. It also quantifies the
impact of the new standards for market risk (FRTB) and credit valuation
adjustments (CVA).
- The cumulative impact analysis of the Basel III monitoring exercise
report uses a total sample of 99 banks.The Basel III capital monitoring
report shows the results separately for Group 1 and Group 2 banks.
Group 1 banks are those with Tier 1 capital in excess of EUR 3 billion
and are internationally active. All other banks are categorised as Group
2 banks.
- For three Global Systemically Important institutions, which are
considered outliers owing to overly conservative assumptions under the
revised market risk framework, the results showing ‘reduced estimation
bias’ assume zero change between the current and the revised market risk
framework. According to the “conservative estimation”, based on the
original conservative assumptions, the total impact would be 13.9%, with
a total risk-based impact of 19.1% and market risk impact of 1.5%.
Together with the Report, an interactive tool
showing the main results is made available for analytical purposes. The
official figures and conclusions are the ones presented in the public
Basel III monitoring Report. Therefore, any interpretation based on the
data provided within the visualisation tool must be taken with caution.
Documents
links
EBA
© EBA
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article