For the 2020 SREP cycle, we adopted a pragmatic approach given the outbreak of the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. We focused on how banks were handling the challenges arising from the crisis and kept most Pillar 2 requirements (P2R) and Pillar 2 guidance (P2G) stable.
Welcome to our press conference on the Supervisory Review and Evaluation Process – SREP for short.
In 2021 we returned to a full SREP assessment. I will outline the
results by concentrating on four main topics. First, the resilience that
banks have shown. Second, the risks that could still materialise from
the COVID-19 fallout. Third, the structural challenges which predate the
pandemic but continue to weigh on banks. And fourth, risks that are
still emerging but already require immediate action.
A resilient banking sector navigating through an uncertain macroeconomic environment
When I spoke at last year’s press conference, economic forecasts
projected that output would return to pre-pandemic levels in mid-2022,
following the record drop in activity during the first phase of the
pandemic. Thankfully, the recovery was even faster than expected. Output
has already rebounded to pre-pandemic levels, and economic growth is
projected to remain strong over the next three years. But there is still
uncertainty about how the pandemic will evolve, mostly owing to the
potential spread of new virus variants, and supply chain disruptions are
weighing on trade and overall economic activity...
much more + charts at SSM
© ECB - European Central Bank
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article