The European Banking Authority (EBA) today published its Report on the impact and calibration of the Standardised Approach to Counterparty Credit Risk (SA-CCR), simplified SA-CCR and Original Exposure Method (OEM).
The impact of setting alpha equal to 1 under SA-CCR for the purposes of the output floor (OF) on a permanent basis is also analysed.
- Estimated aggregate impact from the introduction of new counterparty credit risk (CCR) standard methods in the EU in terms of exposure value (EV) stands at -7.2% (+31% for the median bank). Larger banks mainly experienced negative impacts while banks with smaller derivative business displayed large positive impacts on CCR, but limited impact on total credit risk.
- Derivative business mainly moved from the Mark-to-Market Method (MtM) to the SA-CCR. Compared to the old methods, margined business is better recognised under SA-CCR.
- In terms of calibration, compared to the internal model method (IMM), SA-CCR produces EV figures 60% higher on average (+40% for the median bank). These results are in line with the BCBS objectives for the calibration of the SA-CCR framework.
- Simplified SA-CCR EV figures are on average 60% higher than the SA-CCR ones (+40% for the median bank). The OEM is the most conservative approach: compared to simplified SA-CCR, average EV figures are 110% higher (+30% for the median bank).
- Setting alpha equal to 1 on a permanent basis under SA-CCR for the purposes of the OF reduces the impact of the OF only marginally (-0.2%).
EBA
© EBA
Key

Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning

Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article