ESMA has urged Brussels to push back reforms from February...    Changes could raise costs and threaten liquidity, critics say
      
    
    
      Officials from European Union member states will meet on Wednesday to discuss calls to delay sweeping reforms that threaten to drive up costs in Europe’s settled-securities market.
Brussels is facing pressure from lobby groups to 
postpone the February start date of changes designed to help make 
settling securities safer and more efficient in the bloc. Under the 
proposals, if one party fails to deliver a security as planned, the 
other side will be able to buy it independently then pass the cost back 
to the original counterparty, according to Ashley Rowlands, managing 
associate at Linklaters LLP. 
        
    This process is currently voluntary, but would become mandatory, he said.
The measures have sparked pushback from 
industry groups,
 the European Securities and Markets Authority and Italian officials, 
amid concerns that firms are unprepared and that the changes could 
threaten the bloc’s competitiveness. There were more than 
53 trillion-euro ($61 trillion) worth of securities in EU securities settlement systems at the end of 2019, according to European Central Bank 
data cited by the European Commission.
‘Truly Problematic’
ESMA  called for a delay in September and said the reforms were causing companies “serious difficulties.”
 It’s waiting for further clarity from the Commission, and the ball is 
in their court, according to a spokeswoman for the regulator.
        
    And the Italian delegation to the working group 
has said the reforms are “truly problematic” and could increase pressure
 on liquidity in the market, as well as drive up the cost of certain 
securities, according to a working paper dated Monday....
more at Bloomberg
      
      
      
      
        © Bloomberg
     
      
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article