Fundamental flaws in its [BMR] conception mean that without significant reform, the BMR could expose benchmark users in the EU to the threats that BMR was intended to protect them from, putting them at a competitive disadvantage to users of benchmarks in other jurisdictions.
European retail and institutional investors use European Union
(EU) and third-country benchmarks for a variety of critical commercial
purposes, from hedging their exposures to converting overseas revenue
and repatriating funds. The EU Benchmarks Regulation (BMR) was intended
to protect European investors from the risks and disruption posed by
poorly run or failing benchmarks. Instead, fundamental flaws in its
conception mean that without significant reform, the BMR could expose
benchmark users in the EU to the threats that BMR was intended to
protect them from, putting them at a competitive disadvantage to users
of benchmarks in other jurisdictions.
In May 2022, the European Commission published its latest consultation on reforming the BMR. ISDA’s response is here.
To coincide with the consultation, ISDA, the Asia Securities Industry
and Financial Markets Association, the Futures Industry Association,
the Global Foreign Exchange Division of the Global Financial Markets
Association, the European Association of Corporate Treasurers and EMTA
published an updated version of their June 2020 recommendations, aimed
at maintaining the intended protections of the BMR while reducing the
potential for uncertainty, disruption and preventing EU investors being
put at a competitive disadvantage versus non-EU entities.
for Reforming the EU Benchmarks Regulation: Updated Recommendations
The Importance of Reforming the EU Benchmarks Regulation(pdf)
ISDA
© ISDA - International Swaps and Derivatives Association
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article