Derivatives and securities financing transactions (SFTs) interconnect in a variety of ways and share many common features, but participants that straddle both markets have to use two or more similarly structured agreements to document their derivatives and SFT trades – a situation that can be both complex and duplicative.
We think there’s an
opportunity to bring greater alignment and efficiency to these markets
in certain use cases, which is why we’ve published new documentation that will give firms the option to trade derivatives and SFTs under a single ISDA Master Agreement.
There’s a strong efficiency and cost rationale for this. While
certain terms in each agreement are specific to derivatives, securities
lending or repo markets, there is significant overlap in several other
areas – for instance, default and termination conditions, notice
provisions, and representations and warranties. These relationship-level
terms are not always defined in the same way, and the processes and
methodologies involved may differ, creating operational challenges and
repetition for those institutions active in both markets.
Aligning these common terms via a single ISDA Master Agreement will
avoid the need for multiple umbrella agreements, reducing the
operational burden for participants. At the same time, the flexible
modular structure of the ISDA Master Agreement means firms still have
the ability to capture the unique features of the SFT market: the 2022
ISDA Securities Financing Transactions Definitions set explicit terms
for SFT trades, while the SFT Schedule Provisions enable counterparties
to customize their relationship to account for the specificities of
securities lending and repo transactions.
There are many benefits to this approach. Critically, using a single
agreement will expand netting sets, enabling institutions to reduce
credit risk. ISDA will now prioritize the commissioning of updated
netting opinions covering SFTs, with the first scheduled to be available
later this year. At that point, firms will have the option to enter
into new SFT and derivatives transactions under a single master
agreement with the confidence of enforceable close-out netting across
both product sets.
Using a single agreement will also reduce duplication of effort when
negotiating and managing documentation, shrink operational costs as a
result of firms referencing a common documentation standard within their
systems, and enable any legal or regulatory updates to be rolled out
consistently for both sets of products.
In addition, having common legal standards, terms and documentation
should make it possible to develop technology solutions that can be
applied consistently and at scale across both derivatives and SFT
markets. In fact, the SFT definitions and related provisions have been
published in a digital format, creating further efficiencies in how
firms use and interact with the documents, reducing complexity and
facilitating greater automation.
We recognize this may not be for everyone – use of the SFT
definitions and provisions will initially likely appeal most to those
firms engaged in certain structured trades involving both derivatives
and SFTs. Over time, though, institutions may opt for the convenience,
simplicity and cost savings of using a single agreement in other
situations.
For us, this is all about meeting our mission of fostering safe and
efficient markets. At a time when our members are focused on enhancing
operational efficiency and cutting costs, we want to make sure they have
the options available to do that.
ISDA
© ISDA - International Swaps and Derivatives Association
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article