Some pension fund associations had expressed concern about the reporting burden and costs that compliance could entail, in particular given that the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) was also planning reporting requirements.
In a feedback statement published in connection with the final regulation, the ECB said that, from the outset, it paid attention to the issue of containing costs.
“To this end, and taking into account the proportionality principle in particular, the reporting requirements as set out in the initial proposal have been significantly streamlined, especially for smaller pension funds,” it said.
There were four main changes to the initial proposal, according to the ECB.
These included a postponement of the first reporting deadline, a phasing-in period to align the ECB regime with supervisory reporting requirements from EIOPA, and a clarification of the term “pensions funds managers”.
The ECB said it and EIOPA had cooperated closely and had achieved a “very high” level of convergence between the reporting regimes.
“This will allow a single data flow for reporting by the industry, should this be decided at the national level by the respective national central banks and national competent authorities,” said the ECB.
This means that, should a national supervisory authority decide, a pension fund would be able to report one set of data to that authority, a spokesman for the ECB confirmed. The authority would then report to the national central bank, which would pass the data to the ECB.
The purpose of the new reporting and data collection regime, according to the ECB, is to “increase the transparency of pension funds for the benefit of their members, the general public and the economy as a whole”.
Full news
© IPE International Publishers Ltd.
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article