04 February 2015

EFRAG, OIC, ASBJ: Feedback statement on paper about accounting and disclosure for goodwill

Most respondents agreed with the main conclusion that the impairment-only model for acquired goodwill did not provide the most appropriate solution for subsequent measurement of goodwill.

Respondents agreed with the preliminary views of the Research Group that amortisation of goodwill should be reintroduced, but also pointed out that there are areas for improvement in the impairment testing. In commenting on this matter, they referred to various reasons including the fact that amortisation would reasonably reflect the consumption of the economic resources acquired in the business combination and allocate the costs of acquired goodwill to the periods it was consumed.

Nonetheless, these respondents provided mixed views on whether the IASB should indicate a maximum amortisation period. Some respondents acknowledged the subjectivity and high level of judgement in determining the useful life of goodwill. However, they believed that the level of subjectivity and judgement was not higher than that in the impairment test. In general, respondents who supported the amortisation of goodwill considered that the IASB should develop guidance to help preparers determining the useful life of the acquired goodwill.

In contrast, a minority of respondents, mostly users, were supportive of the current impairment-only approach. These respondents explained that the amortisation model was fairly meaningless and it would not be beneficial to users of financial statements.

Improvements to the guidance and disclosures in IAS 36

Many respondents considered that the impairment-only approach was a challenge in practice and that there was room to improve the guidance in IAS 36. These respondents identified a number of difficulties related to the current approach and provided some suggestions on what should be improved.

When questioned about whether there was a need to improve disclosure requirements on impairment tests, respondents provided mixed views. Some considered that there was room for improvement, while others did not. Nonetheless, respondents emphasised that any additional disclosure requirements should be considered in the context of overall amount of disclosure requirements, which are already considered extensive.

In addition, many respondents highlighted that the relevance of impairment testing for goodwill, and consequently the need for improved guidance and disclosures, would significantly decrease if the IASB reintroduced amortisation.

Amortisation and separate recognition of intangible assets from goodwill

Many respondents considered that, if the IASB reintroduced amortisation of acquired goodwill, it should require the same for virtually all intangible assets (including those with indefinite useful lives). They also suggested that the IASB reconsider the requirement to recognise separately intangible assets in business combinations, especially when the IASB decides to reintroduce the requirement regarding amortisation of acquired goodwill.

Press release

Feedback statement

© EFRAG - European Financial Reporting Advisory Group