This website, like most others, uses cookies to give you a great online experience. By continuing to use our website, you agree to our usage of cookies.
You can find out more about cookies and how to change your cookie preferences.
Graham Bishop is renowned for his vision and the courage to propose radical ideas, yet ground them in a mastery of the technical details of the financial system. He has been referred to as a one-man think tank.
European Commission: His influence at the meeting point of politics, economics and finance has been recognised on many occasions - most recently when the European Commission asked him to study the attitudes of investors toward the euro area sovereign bond markets. In particular, he explored attitudes towards the potential for a “common euro area safe asset”: what characteristics should it possess and whether it would ameliorate any of the concerns expressed about the features of existing bond markets.
Graham's many pro bono activities illuminate and reinforce his Consultancy Services. His deep knowledge of Europe’s financial system is integrated with his understanding of EU economic and budgetary policy-making – whilst set within the necessary framework of democratic accountability.
He was a member of the Commission's Consultative Group on the Impact of the Euro on Capital Markets; of the Commission's Strategy Group on Financial Services; and of the Committee of Independent Experts on the preparation of the changeover to the single currency (1994/5).
This Website, as well as Graham's Consultancy Service, is designed to bring clients the direct insights that flow from Graham’s position as a leading technical analyst of economic and structural developments in the financial markets of Europe.
"Institutional investors and major financial firms now face a huge commercial challenge in Europe. The vision of political integration has entered a critical phase: ...."
"..analysis of obscure bureaucratic manoeuvrings towards fiscal union, labour mobility and tax co-ordination etc. is quite outside the comfort zone of many..."
"It is now entirely foreseeable that governments may make potentially far-reaching changes that would impact the valuation of European financial assets, as well as reforming the nature of the regulations governing key parts of the financial sector’s business".
"..So the consequences of this crisis will be historic – and will reverberate around global financial markets. The stakes for participants in European financial markets could not be higher.."
Consultancy services can take many forms: face-to-face meetings, telephone discussions, written comments, speeches, special articles, customised research projects, etc.
The Eurosystem comprises the European Central Bank (ECB) and the national central banks of the Member States that have adopted the euro as a common currency. On 5 July 2011, the ECB published on its website the Eurosystem Oversight Policy Framework, which describes the Eurosystem’s role in the oversight of ‘payment, clearing and settlement systems’. According to the ECB, the oversight of those systems and that infrastructure as a whole stems from the task assigned to it by the FEU Treaty of promoting the smooth operation of payment systems and from Article 22 of the Statute of the European System of Central Banks and of the ECB, which provides that ‘the ECB may make regulations, to ensure efficient and sound clearing and payment systems within the Union and with other countries’.
In the Policy Framework, the ECB explained that securities settlement systems and central counterparty clearing houses (central counterparties; ‘CCPs’) 1 are key components of the financial system. A financial, legal or operational problem affecting them can be a source of systemic disturbance for the financial system. That is particularly true of CCPs in that they are a focal point for credit and liquidity risk. It was further stated in the Policy Framework that malfunctioning on the part of infrastructures located outside the euro area could have adverse effects on payment systems located in the euro area, whilst the Eurosystem has no direct influence on such infrastructures. The ECB drew the conclusion that infrastructures that settle euro-denominated transactions should be legally incorporated in the euro area with full managerial and operational control and responsibility, over all core functions, exercised from within that area.
The ECB stated that this location policy applies to CCPs which, on average, have a daily net credit exposure of more than €5 billion in one of the main euro-denominated product categories.
The United Kingdom brought an action before the General Court, contending, in particular, that the ECB lacks competence to impose a location requirement in respect of CCPs.
In its judgment delivered today, the General Court annuls the European Oversight Policy Framework published by the ECB in so far as it sets a requirement for CCPs involved in the clearing of securities to be located within the Eurozone.
Stating that creation of such a requirement goes beyond mere oversight by intervening in the regulation of their activity, the General Court holds that the ECB lacks the competence necessary to regulate the activity of securities clearing systems as its competence is limited to payment systems alone by Article 127(2) of the FEU Treaty. Accordingly, in the absence of an explicit reference to the clearing of securities in Article 22 of the Statute, the term ‘clearing and payment system’ must be interpreted as intended to make it clear that the ECB has competence to adopt regulations to ensure efficiency and safety of payment systems, including those with a clearing stage, rather than granting it an autonomous regulatory competence in respect of all clearing systems.
The General Court then rejects the ECB’s line of argument to the effect that the task entrusted to it by the FEU Treaty of promoting the sound operation of payment systems means that it necessarily has the power to regulate the activity of securities clearing infrastructures. The General Court states that, if the ECB were to consider that that power is necessary for proper performance of the task referred to, it would be for the ECB, acting on the basis of Article 129(3) of the FEU Treaty, to request the EU legislature to amend Article 22 of the Statute, by the addition of an explicit reference to securities clearing systems.
Full press release
No Comments for this Article