Credit standards for loans to enterprises were eased marginally in the first quarter of 2018, in line with expectations in the previous survey round.
The survey covers three loan categories: loans to enterprises, loans to households for house purchase, and consumer credit and other loans to households. [...] For the third time in succession, credit standards for loans to households for house purchase were eased slightly, bucking earlier expectations that no adjustment would be made. Credit standards for consumer credit and other loans to households were eased moderately on balance, above and beyond the extent expected in the previous quarter.
In addition to credit standards, banks also eased their overall terms and conditions in all three surveyed loan categories. This was achieved mainly through margins, which were narrowed irrespective of borrowers’ creditworthiness. Banks once again cited high competitive pressure as the main reason for narrowing margins.
Demand for loans increased in all three loan categories. Demand from households for loans for house purchase, in particular, returned to more dynamic growth than in previous quarters.
The April survey contained ad hoc questions on banks' financing conditions, the levels of credit standards, the impact of the Eurosystem's expanded asset purchase programme (EAPP), and the consequences for credit business of the negative interest rate on the Eurosystem's deposit facility. The German banks reported that, given the situation in the financial markets, their funding situation showed very little change compared with the preceding quarter. Credit standards for loans to enterprises are currently somewhat lower than their reference value relative to the midpoint of the range set by the credit standards implemented since the second quarter of 2010. The standards for loans to households for house purchase are considerably tighter, while standards for consumer loans are at the same level as the reference value. According to respondents, the Eurosystem’s expanded asset purchase programme continued to improve banks’ liquidity position and funding conditions. On the other hand, the programme continued to place a strain on credit institutions’ profitability. The negative interest rate on the deposit facility contributed considerably to a decline in banks’ net interest income and, moreover, led to falling lending rates and shrinking margins. At the same time, the negative interest rate on the deposit facility, viewed in isolation, led to a slight increase in the volume of loans to households yet had no impact on loans to enterprises.
Press release
Survey
© Deutsche Bundesbank
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article