Council approved the outcome of negotiations between member states, the European Parliament and the European Commission on public country-by-country reporting ("trilogue outcome"). Sweden and Cyprus voted against, the Czech Republic, Ireland, Luxembourg and Malta abstained, which is generally seen as a rejection.
18 months after the
directive comes into force, companies operating in Europe with a total consolidated
turnover of more than €750 million in the last two consecutive financial years
will have to disclose relevant tax information by country. This is expected to
be the case by mid-2023.
Sven Giegold, financial and economic policy spokesperson of the
Greens/EFA group in the European Parliament, comments:
"This is a
milestone for greater tax justice in Europe. Now we are past the last major
hurdle to ensure greater tax transparency by large companies. Public
country-by-country reporting marks the beginning of a new era of tax
transparency. The instrument is an effective tool against tax dumping. Public
country-by-country reporting will reveal how great the damage to the public
purse caused by tax dumping really is. The days of intra-European tax havens
being able to drain tax revenues from their EU partners are numbered. After
years of resistance, the German government has now finally agreed to this
legislative project, too.
I have long
personally advocated for public country-by-country reporting by large
companies. If large companies have to disclose their profits and taxes paid per
country where they do business, tax dumping will become visible for all to see
every year. As a result, aggressive tax avoidance leads to regular reputational
damage for individual companies. It also highlights the lack of solidarity in
the tax policies of individual EU member states. This compromise is just the
beginning, as the Council has refused to agree to the global disaggregation of
relevant tax data. The U.S. is currently working on a law that would require
U.S. companies registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission to
implement public country-by-country reporting - with the worldwide
disaggregation of tax-relevant data per country of operation. As with minimum
taxation, the USA is once again one step ahead of Europe.
It is only a matter
of time before all tax-relevant information of large companies will become
public worldwide. Those who fear competitive disadvantages for their companies
should work to ensure that country-by-country reporting in the OECD's
international framework becomes public for all. Investors, who collectively
manage $2.9 trillion, are also calling for public country-by-country reporting.
To be efficient, markets need information. In the wake of the Corona crisis and
in light of the necessary investments in climate mitigation, infrastructure and
education, tax competition must be called out for what it is: tax dumping puts
the cohesion in our societies at risk, because our solidarities are built on
solidarity.
In the run-up to the
Council vote, unfortunately, eight Member States have again expressed concerns
about the legal basis of the directive. I strongly advise European tax havens
such as Ireland and Luxembourg not to take legal action against the legal basis
of the directive. This would send a fatal signal at a time when tax cooperation
is more important than ever to jointly master the challenges ahead."
Background:
The European
Parliament had already defined its negotiating position on country-by-country
tax reporting in July 2017, and after more than four years of tough wrangling
in the Council, final adoption of the legislative text is now imminent. The
German government had long blocked this project in the Council.
Breakthrough on
public country-by-country reporting in the Council on February 25: https://sven-giegold.de/en/breakthrough-for-tax-transparency/
EU agreement on
public country-by-country reporting: a milestone for greater tax justice! on
June 1: https://sven-giegold.de/en/agreement-public-country-by-country-reporting/
About 80 percent of
the tax revenues lost from large corporations in the EU are due to European tax
havens, thus most of the tax revenues currently lost in the EU are covered by
the directive: "About 80% of the profits shifted out of the European Union
are shifted to the E.U. tax havens, primarily Ireland, Luxembourg, and the
Netherlands, while the profits shifted out of the United States are primarily
shifted to the non-E.U. havens." https://gabriel-zucman.eu/files/TWZ2020.pdf pp. 30-31
Investors urge
Financial Accounting Standards Board to prioritize public country-specific tax
reporting: https://thefactcoalition.org/investors-call-on-financial-accounting-standards-board-to-prioritize-public-country-by-country-tax-reporting/
Voting Behaviour of Member States in the Council.
Press release from the Council.
© Sven Giegold
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article