Two things need fixing in Italy, both of which are beyond the scope of the technocrats, writes Münchau in his FT column.
The announcement by Mario Monti that he intends to resign as Italy’s prime minister tells us two things: politics is intruding, and the crisis is getting worse again.
I have always respected Mr Monti as a European commissioner and a wise observer of European affairs, but I am more sceptical about his performance as Italy’s head of government. The sometimes uncritical adulation he enjoyed was based on the notion that you could solve Italy’s problems by putting politics aside, imposing a few reforms and a lot of austerity. The consensus in Italy was that only a technocratic government could deliver these policies.
There are now two things that need fixing in Italy, both of which are intensely political and beyond the scope of technocrats.
The first is to reverse austerity immediately – essentially to undo Mr Monti’s work. The tax rises and spending cuts are having a counterproductive effect. By reducing both debt and growth, the debt-to-GDP ratio has increased in the short term and I doubt that it will fall by much in the long run. The deterioration in Italy’s debt sustainability will become much clearer next year, as we get more statistical evidence of the calamitous effect of austerity...
The second priority is to stand up to Angela Merkel. This was something Mr Monti was unwilling – and incapable – of delivering. He tried a bit of grandstanding at the European summit in June, but he never managed to confront the German chancellor on the one issue that mattered: that without some form of debt mutualisation – a eurozone bond – it was hard to see that a country with a debt-to-GDP ratio of 130 per cent and virtually no growth could remain a member of the eurozone, and keep on rolling over its debts for ever. Only an elected leader is in a position to force a choice. A technocratic prime minister cannot be expected to produce a credible counter-threat if the answer is no.
The best outcome for Italy would be a political leader who forces the issue of Italy’s future with a clear-headed sense of what choice the eurozone and the country will need to make. Otherwise, Italy risks being pushed into a position like that of Greece, which pursued similar policies and has no choices left.
© Financial Times
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article