In 2020, the UK was still part of the EU single market, accounting for 70% of turnover in EEA equity. By excluding the majority of trading in EEA instruments, the report portrays a misinterpreted picture of markets, says the Federation of European Securities Exchanges (FESE).
As per the withdrawal agreement, the UK remained part of the EU
single market until the end of 2020, with its trading still subject to
the MiFIR share trading obligation.
As of 1st January 2021, UK trading was outside the EU single market and
hence, through the share trading obligation, a significant part of this
UK activity migrated to the EU. However, ESMA’s Annual Statistical Report
for 2020 data presents indicators for EEA30, excluding UK data, and so
reaching conclusions that misrepresent the reality. The truth is that,
in the year 2020, the UK was a central part of the EEA securities
markets.
With the approach taken, 19 EUR trillion in equity trading is left
out of the scope of the main report and only mentioned in the executive
summary. In 2020, the most trading in equities was conducted in the UK,
represented not only trading on trading venues, but also SI trading and
OTC. Off-venue volumes (including SI and OTC trading) are clearly
underestimated since all transactions reported in 2020 via a UK APA in
EEA instruments are excluded. Were they included, it would bring
on-venue trading (including RMs and MTFs) down to 56%, instead of 82%.
ESMA’s chosen approach does not only differ from that adopted for
2019 but will also differ from the one for 2021 since, with the
application of the share trading obligation, most of the UK flows on
European securities have shifted to EU venues; data for 2021 will
include the majority of SI and OTC activity which ESMA excludes for
2020.
Therefore, the conclusions of the report could lead to
misinterpreting the full liquidity landscape of EU securities trading in
2020, ignoring the bulk of trading in EEA instruments. ESMA must
oversee turnover in EEA instruments.
Commenting on ESMA’s decision to omit UK data from the report, Director General of FESE, Rainer Riess, remarked:
“It
is highly concerning that ESMA has ignored the reality of the UK’s
status in 2020. This isn’t a mere technical disagreement, either – this
decision will have a serious impact on the policy debate. It is critical
for ESMA to monitor the trading of EEA instruments outside of the Union
on a continuous basis and whether the share trading obligation is being
adhered to going forward.”
FESE President and CEO of the Prague Stock Exchange, Petr Koblic, observed:
“We
are in a moment where the EU is building the Capital Markets Union, and
we are in intense discussions about equity market structure rules. I do
believe the EU interests will not benefit from a too narrowly focused
statistical report that ignores two thirds of the trading landscape,
only looking at 30% of the trading EEA shares and ignoring the other
70%.”
FESE
© FESE
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article