The report concludes there is no convincing case for why the UK needs a central bank digital currency (CBDC). The committee found that while a CBDC may provide some advantages, it could present significant challenges for financial stability and the protection of privacy.
The Economic Affairs Committee has published its report, ‘Central bank digital currencies: a solution in search of a problem?’
Background
A CBDC would be a form of central bank electronic money that could be
used to make everyday payments - in essence a ‘digital banknote’. The
Government has not yet decided whether to introduce a CBDC.
If a CBDC is introduced, it is inevitable that some people will
transfer money out of their bank accounts and into CBDC wallets. Without
safeguards, such as limits on the amount of CBDC individuals can hold,
financial instability could be exacerbated during periods of economic
stress as people seek to replace bank deposits with CBDC which may be
perceived as safer.
To prevent their use in large-scale criminal activity, any CBDC
system could not support anonymous transactions in the same way that
cash can be spent anonymously. While there are design options that would
provide some privacy safeguards, technical specifications alone may be
insufficient to counter public concern over the risk of state
surveillance. The Bank of England risks being drawn into controversial
debates on privacy.
A CBDC could enable central banks to conduct forms of unconventional
monetary policy more easily. While the Governor of the Bank of England
told the committee that he did not see a CBDC as a way to implement
monetary policy, the committee noted that his successors may disagree.
Such measures may increase the Bank of England’s role and influence in
the economy and any changes to the Bank’s monetary policy toolkit should
be scrutinised carefully. The committee recommended that the Joint
Taskforce publishes its assessment of the potential for monetary policy
via a CBDC in its 2022 consultation to assist this scrutiny.
The introduction of CBDCs by the UK’s strategic competitors may have
consequences for western foreign policy. For example, the SWIFT
messaging system enhances the US’s ability to implement sanctions.
However, there is political will in certain countries, such as China, to
create alternatives to the existing international payments system using
CBDC technology.
Key findings
- There are two main security risks posed by a CBDC. First, individual
accounts could be compromised through weaknesses in cyber security.
Second, the centralised CBDC ledger, which would be a critical piece of
national infrastructure, could be a target for attack from hostile state
and non-state actors. While no design can guarantee absolute security,
any CBDC system will need to be adaptable to emerging security threats
and technological change, including fast-developing quantum computing.
- There may be some benefits from the introduction of a ‘wholesale’
CBDC for use between financial institutions. While the wholesale
operations of the monetary system are already efficient, a CBDC may help
to further enhance efficiency in securities trading and settlement, but
further exploration and experimentation are necessary. The committee
recommends the Joint Taskforce consults on the use case for a wholesale
CBDC alongside its 2022 retail CBDC consultation.
- The case for a digital pound may change in the future and therefore
the Government and Bank of England could derive most benefit now by
taking action to shape global standards which suit the UK’s values and
interests, for example with regard to privacy, security and operational
standards.
Chair’s comments
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, Chair of the House of Lords Economic Affairs Committee, said:
“The introduction of a UK central bank digital
currency would have far-reaching consequences for households,
businesses, and the monetary system. We found the potential benefits of a
digital pound, as set out by the Bank of England, to be overstated or
achievable through less risky alternatives.
“We took evidence from a
variety of witnesses and none of them were able to give us a compelling
reason for why the UK needed a central bank digital currency. The
concept seems to present a lot of risk for very little reward. We
concluded that the idea was a solution in search of a problem.”
UK Parliament
© House of Lords
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article