In line with previous position papers, ALFI disagrees with EBA’s approach to classify Money Market Funds and certain AIFs as shadow banking entities.
      
    
    
      Question  5:  In  general,  what  are  your  views  on  the  treatment  of  funds  in  these  draft  RTS?  Do  you  
agree with the approach adopted in these draft RTS, that follows the approach in the EBA Guidelines 
on  limits  on  exposures  to  shadow  banking  entities,  or  alternatively  should  it  be  extended  to  capture  
those funds as shadow banking entities?  
 
ALFI  response: 
In ALFI’s view, funds should not be considered as shadow banking entities due to manifold reasons: 
- Being investment products, funds, generally speaking, operate with a completely different business 
model compared to banks.  
- There is a different set of regulatory requirements to mitigate risks that may be faced by investment 
funds.  
- Funds do not collect repayable funds from the public and accordingly their failure does not pose a 
systemic  risk  towards  the  public  in  the  same  way  as  banks.  To  the  contrary,  funds  conduct  an  
investment activity and investors in funds are made aware that they may lose their entire investment, 
which means that the fund is generally not liable to repay invested amounts to its investors, unlike 
banks that are required to repay deposits to their clients. 
 
Keeping  in  mind  the  organic  differences  between  banks  and  funds  and  between  their  respective  
regulations,  investment  funds  should  in  general  not  be  considered  as  comparable  to  banks  and 
therefore not as shadow banking entities. 
Furthermore, we do not share EBA’s view as per the definition of shadow banking entities that money 
market funds (MMFs) (both UCITS  and AIFs) and certain AIFs carry out banking activities outside the 
regulated framework.  
The MMF Regulation (MMFR), the UCITS  and AIFMD directives (as well as their implementing acts) 
and  related  ESMA   Guidelines  have  introduced  a  robust  regulatory  framework,  ensuring  prudential 
supervision  in  a  manner  adapted  to  the  specificities  of  investment  funds.  This  framework  contains 
aspects discussed in the consultation such as risk management, including credit, liquidity and leverage risk...
much more at ALFI
      
      
      
      
        © ALFI - Association of the Luxembourg Fund Industry
     
      
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
 
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article