British firms face a bill of up to £1.6 billion if Boris Johnson’s government fails to convince the EU to grant an adequacy decision allowing dataflows to continue, according to a new report published by the New Economics Foundation thinktank and University College.
The economic modelling used in the report
by the New Economics Foundation thinktank and University College London
estimates that the additional compliance cost for firms wanting to
continue transferring data will range from an average £3,000 for a micro
business to almost £163,000 for a large company.
The report was based on interviews with 60 legal professionals, data
protection officers, business representatives, and academics, from the
UK and EU.
In total, the cost to UK firms of no adequacy decision would likely
be between £1 billion and £1.6 billion. This extra cost stems from the
additional compliance obligations – such as setting up standard
contractual clauses (SCCs).
The report estimates that, in UCL’s case, the university would have to amend and update more than 5,000 contracts.
The report also contends that the new compliance requirements will
leave the UK exposed to an increased risk of GDPR [General Data
Protection Regulation] fines, reduced investment and the relocation of
business functions, infrastructure, and personnel outside the UK.
With less than six weeks until the transition period ends and the UK
leaves the EU’s single market, talks on an EU-UK trade pact are on the
brink of conclusion.
However, even if the UK agrees and ratifies a post-Brexit trade
agreement with the EU by the end of 2020, a data adequacy decision will
still be required from the European Commission for cross-border data
flows to continue.
The UK has already applied the EU’s GDPR into its national law, but
as a ‘third country’ outside the EU, it needs an adequacy decision –
which determines that a third country has an adequate data protection
regime and that European personal data can be processed there.
Digital and tech account for 14.5% of all UK service exports, more
than £30 billion, making the UK the largest digital market in Europe.
The EU executive is currently conducting an assessment of the UK’s
data protection landscape and discussions between the EU executive and
the UK government on data adequacy have been taking place since March.
But the decision is far from a certainty, primarily because of EU and
civil society concerns about the UK’s surveillance regime and
membership of the ‘Five Eyes’ intelligence alliance with Australia,
Canada, New Zealand, and the United States.
“We do not know whether or not the UK will introduce some changes in
their national legislation which might deviate from the general line of
the general data protection regulation,” EU Commissioner for Values and
Transparency, Věra Jourová, said earlier this year.
The NEF/UCL report warns that “potential EU concerns with UK national
security, surveillance and human rights frameworks, as well as a future
trade deal with the US, render adequacy uncertain”.
Earlier this year, Prime Minister Boris Johnson suggested that the UK
would seek to diverge from EU data protection law and opt for
lighter-touch regulation, a path set out in his government’s National
Data Strategy.
EURACTIV
© EURACTIV
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article