The continued flow of customers’ and employees’ personal data is vital to many businesses, supply chains and public authorities to ensure effective functioning.
UK organisations can currently
transfer personal data freely between the UK and the European Economic Area
(EEA) under the provisions of the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement. However, from 31
December 2020, the UK will become a “third country” and two sets of rules will
begin to apply; the UK transfer rules and the EU transfer rules (applicable to
data from the EU and EEA).
From the end of the transition
period, the UK government has stated that restricted personal data transfers
outwards from the UK to the EEA will be permitted, as they currently are under
the EEA data protection laws, the adequacy of which the UK intends to
recognise. However, the framework will be kept under review by the UK
regulatory authorities.
The European Commission and the
UK government are currently undertaking an adequacy assessment, with the
intention remaining for the Commission to reach an adequacy decision prior to
the end of the transition period, so that data can continue to flow freely from
the EEA to the UK.
With the test for adequacy
being “equivalent as” and not “identical to”, the fact that no other sovereign
nation has uniquely approached the assessment as a former EU member state, with
an almost identical legal framework, provides optimism for UK organisations in
the absence of a guarantee.
Common concerns
Despite the adequacy assessment
being separate and distinct from the broader UK-EU negotiations, there are
common concerns that overlap to form potential barriers to a positive adequacy decision,
including:
The UK’s stated objective of
developing a sovereign data protection system, indicating a divergence from the
EU in the future
The UK Data Protection Act
2018’s exemption for processing personal data for immigration purposes
The UK’s legal framework on the
retention of electronic telecommunications data
The UK government and law
enforcement authorities’ access to data (and potential onward transfer to the
US) for national security, law enforcement and mass surveillance purposes,
which the Court of Justice of the European Union has placed at the forefront in
both the Schrems I and Schrems II decisions.
Anticipating that an adequacy
decision may not be available beyond the end of the transition period, UK
organisations should begin to prepare for the implementation of the other
permitted safeguards and derogations to ensure business-critical continuity
with the EEA, as follows:
Standard contractual clauses
(SCCs) will be the best approach for the majority of UK organisations, so long
as they are applied appropriately and correctly. SCCs cannot be used for
EU-based processor to UK-based controller transfers and are recommended for
small or medium-sized businesses. The Commission is in the process of updating
the SCCs, which the UK government has stated it intends to recognise following
the end of the transition period. The application of the new SCCs to UK
organisations should be considered and prepared well in advance of the
transition end date, once the Commission makes these available.
Ad hoc contractual clauses:
Modifications to SCCs, beyond those set out by the Commission or European Union
Data Protection Board would be considered tailored clauses. If not already
approved, authorisation by the national supervisory authority is required.
Binding corporate rules (BCRs):
Large UK organisations or multinational companies with UK/EEA operations may
enter into rules recognising the UK as a third country and governing transfers
of personal data within the group. The UK government has stated its intention
to recognise BCRs authorised under the EU process before the transition end
date. Under the General Data Protection Regulation, BCRs must be approved by
the Information Commissioner.
More to come
At present, no sector-specific
Codes of Conduct and Certification Mechanisms (CCCMs) governing safe
international transfers have been published. However, the ICO has stated that
it intends to work on developing CCCMs and will continue to after the
transition end date.
For UK organisations with
restricted transfers not covered by an adequacy decision, or an appropriate
safeguard, a transfer can only be made if it falls within one of the Article 49
exceptions; the UK organisation should consult the supplemental laws applicable
to the derogation and be mindful that the organisation will need to check for
and adjust to different member state approaches in the relevant area(s).
As the deadline looms, without
significant progress in the negotiations between the UK and the EU, it is
increasingly important for organisations to assess their data transfer
arrangements now.
Clyde & Co has published a
report – Data protection: legal regulatory and practical considerations
post-Brexit – available at:
www.clydeco.com/en/insights/2020/11/data-protection-legal-regulatory-and-practical-con
© Commercial Risk Europe
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article