EU finance ministers are expected to call for an EU authority against money laundering and urge the bloc to harmonise rules and close the door to illicit money, according to draft conclusions seen by EURACTIV.
The EU continues to have an outstanding problem with money laundering
despite five reviews of its legal framework. The 2018 Danske Bank
scandal exposed the regulatory flaws that allowed €200 billion to be
brought into the internal market from dubious origins.
Member states are now ready to tackle the two main problems of the
current system: the loopholes in the EU legislation due to diverging
national implementation and the lack of a central supervisory body.
The latest draft conclusions on anti-money laundering and countering
the financing of terrorism, still subject to changes, are expected to be
adopted during the next EU finance ministers meeting on 4 November.
Given the rise of COVID-19 cases across Europe, the Ecofin Council
has been turned into an informal video conference. Ministers are
expected to give their political blessing, and the document will be
adopted by written procedure afterwards.
A large majority of members states failed to introduce by 10 January
public registers to reveal the true owners of all companies based in
their countries, as part of the fight against money laundering, a report
published on Friday (20 March) revealed.
The Commission plans to put forward ideas in early 2021 to reinforce the anti-money laundering framework.
The ministers want proposals for a single EU rulebook, to avoid
national disparities during the transposition of the EU directives into
national laws, and to lay down the structure and tasks of an EU
supervisor at the same time, “in order to allow for simultaneous
drafting due to the interdependence of these topics,” the draft
conclusions read.
The primary responsibility of the EU supervisor will be a limited
number of entities chosen according to a risk criteria, but it could
also intervene under exceptional situations and take over from national
supervisors if they failed to ensure adequate supervision.
The new European body could conduct general inspections, including
on-site inspections “jointly with the national supervisor”, as well as
issue direct instructions or impose sanctions.
Some of the institutions that would fall under the remit of the EU
authority would be credit institutions; payment institutions; exchange
offices, E-money. institutions, other financial institutions, virtual
asset service providers and custodian wallet providers.
In order to decide whether the supervision is taken at the EU level,
the conclusions proposed to look at the risks arising from the customer
base, products, delivery channels and geographical exposure of these
institutions.
In regard to the single rulebook, the ministers highlighted the
importance of having directly applicable regulation to reduce national
divergences in the transposition that undermine an effective
implementation of the rules.
The areas that should be harmonised under the new regulation are the
types of obliged entities under money laundering rules, customer due
diligence requirements, provisions on due diligence for domestic and
foreign politically exposed persons, record keeping, internal controls.
They also include group-wide compliance, third party reliance and
outsourcing provisions, administrative sanctions consistent with
sectorial legislation, reporting obligations, provisions on determining
beneficial ownership, provisions on cooperation and exchange of
information, and responsibilities and powers of supervisory authorities
at the national and European level.
The European Commission said it would only consider money-laundering
reforms after it completes a thorough assessment of the issue, dashing
hopes the EU executive would act rapidly to crack down on dirty money
flowing through the continent.
The Commission should particularly focus on achieving “uniform and
high standard of customer due diligence”, especially for the
identification of the customer and the verification of the customer’s
identity, the nature and purpose of the business relationship, the
verification of the customer ́s beneficial owner and the ongoing
monitoring of the business relationship.
“Such provisions are crucial to prevent illegal money from entering
the internal market through the weakest link,” the draft conclusions
read.
Recent leaks, including “The Cyprus Papers” revealed by Al-Jazeera or
the FinCen papers published by Buzzfeed, have revealed how criminals
could take advantage of national flaws to operate in the EU market.
EURACTIV
© EURACTIV
Key

Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning

Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article