The buy-side voice of ICMA highlighted several challenges with the implementation measures proposed by the three European authorities, including both firm and product disclosure requirements
      
    
    
      In its response
 AMIC, the buy-side voice of ICMA, highlighted several challenges with 
the implementation measures proposed by the three European authorities, 
including both firm and product disclosure requirements. For instance, 
the proposed quantitative disclosure of asset management companies' ESG 
footprints would not only be of little relevance to investors who invest
 in products, but it will give them an inaccurate picture of the 
principal adverse impacts of assets under management (AUM), as many 
asset classes (sovereign bonds, green bonds, money markets and cash 
equivalents, currency, some commodities) cannot be evaluated against the
 proposed KPIs and given that this approach does not consider the 
materiality concept. In light of the expected delay in adopting the 
implementation measures and the scale of the issues to be resolved, AMIC
 once again urges the EC and the ESAs  to postpone the application date 
of SFDR.
		
		
      
      
      
      
        © ICMA
     
      
      
      
      
      
      Key
      
 Hover over the blue highlighted
        text to view the acronym meaning
      

Hover
        over these icons for more information
      
      
 
     
    
    
      
      Comments:
      
      No Comments for this Article