The pandemic recession is leading Europe’s central bankers to join the fight against climate change—unlike their counterparts at the Federal Reserve.
The pandemic could easily have derailed Christine Lagarde’s plan to
enlist the European Central Bank in the fight against climate change.
Only she won’t let it. “It’s a topic that I am very keen about, which I
believe has a systemic dimension,” she told journalists after the ECB’s
latest monetary policy meeting on Sept. 10.
Lagarde
made battling global warming a defining feature of her eight-years as
managing director of the International Monetary Fund, warning that
humanity would be “roasted, toasted, fried and grilled” if it failed to
act.
She reiterated that message as she vied to become the ECB’s first female president
last year, telling members of the European Parliament that combating
climate change should be “mission critical” for the Frankfurt-based
institution, which sets monetary policy for the 19-nation euro zone.
Lagarde had been at the helm less than four months when Italy
recorded its first death from Covid-19 on Feb. 21. Suddenly, the deadly
new virus assaulting the continent posed a more clear and present danger
than greenhouse gases. The immediate imperative was propping up the
euro-area economy, which shrank almost 15% in the second quarter,
compared with the same period last year—the most on record.
Instead
of allowing the Covid-19 recession to bump climate off her agenda,
Lagarde has used it to try to persuade skeptics that phenomena such as
global warming are well within the remit of monetary policy, a notion
that some of her European peers, notably Bundesbank President Jens
Weidmann, have resisted. Across the Atlantic, the chairman of the U.S.
Federal Reserve has also been lukewarm on the idea. “Society’s overall
response to climate change needs to be decided by elected officials and
not by the Fed,” Fed chairman Jerome Powell said in January.
Lagarde’s argument is that the ECB will not be able to
deliver on its mandate to preserve price stability or properly carry out
its supervisory functions if it does not stay vigilant against threats
from new and unexpected sources. This year, a virus brought the world
economy to a nearly complete halt. Is it really unimaginable, asks the
ECB’s new chief, that the next economic or financial crisis might be
triggered by a devastating series of natural disasters, such as a string
of wildfires or floods?
“It’s absolutely crucial to be prepared,”
says Sabine Mauderer, a board member at the Bundesbank. “The question
is no longer ‘if’ but ‘how’ we can play an active role in the fight
against climate change.”
Prior to her confirmation, Lagarde floated ECB Strategy Starts to Find Focus"> several ideas
for how the ECB could take steps to help alleviate global warming. The
most radical involved greening the bank’s massive quantitative easing
program (QE), in which it buys bonds from banks to lower interest rates.
Lagarde suggested the bank should prioritize purchases of
environmentally friendly securities, but noted this could not be done
overnight. The European market for green corporate bonds is still small,
at around €100 billion ($118.7 billion), and the institution must take
care not to crowd out other investors.
Her comments met with resistance from inside and outside the
institution. The most frequently invoked objection against what Lagarde
was proposing is that the ECB must strive always to be market-neutral.
If the bank were to favor debt issued by makers of wind turbines over
that of oil majors, it would open itself up to accusations that it was
charting its own industrial policy..... more at Bloomberg
© Bloomberg
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article