Insurance Europe has responded to a consultation conducted by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA) on its application guidance on running climate change materiality assessments and using climate change scenarios in an insurer’s Own Risk and Solvency Assessment (ORSA).
While
the industry welcomes the paper, EIOPA’s guidance risks creating a de
facto standard, enabling supervisors to request justifications if
insurers were to deviate from the guidance. This contradicts the meaning
of an ORSA, which is the company's own analysis and should remain so.
Furthermore, the guidance should neither pose constraints nor prescribe
an ORSA structure.
The alignment of the ORSA time horizon with
the strategic and business planning time horizon should be preserved to
ensure that the ORSA remains a decision-useful tool. In addition,
EIOPA’s guidance lacks clear reference to management actions. This is
likely because the scenarios described in the consultation are for
further development and information purposes. However, this should be
made clearer by EIOPA.
EIOPA’s described approach for the
materiality assessment process is quite complex and requires both a wide
availability of detailed exposure data of an appropriate level of
quality and the implementation of a framework for setting the
thresholds, although on a qualitative basis.
Lastly, EIOPA’s
proposed scenario analysis might be onerous for small- and mid-sized
insurers — and even for larger undertakings. Having a simplified
approach for SMEs would, therefore, be appreciated.
InsuranceEurope
© InsuranceEurope
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article