In the Chartered Accountants Ireland’s February magazine, Rodney Irwin, Managing Director, Redefining Value and Education, dives into how Chartered Accountants can fulfil their professional duties by strengthening company value through environmental, social and governance (ESG) criteria.
The COVID-19 pandemic has its origins in nature,
and through poor biosecurity, it made its way into the human
population. Everyone has been impacted to some degree, but how many have
considered the pandemic an issue of sustainable development and,
perhaps, only the tip of an iceberg?
Sustainability is sometimes seen as a cost, but this is not the case. A report by the Business & Sustainable Development Commission estimates
that at least $12 trillion in business opportunities would come with
the realisation of the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals (UN
SDGs) by 2030. So, it is not hard to understand why many companies are
setting ambitious strategies and targets to reap the benefits. Examples
include PepsiCo pledging net-zero emissions by 2040, Stora Enso issuing a €500 million green bond,
and Unilever building its successful strategy around making sustainable
living commonplace. Companies are increasingly shifting towards more
sustainable strategies and stakeholder capitalism by moving away from
short-term shareholder primacy.
Financial and accounting systems
influence decision-making, the assessment of corporate performance, and
the value attributed to it. Therefore, financial and accounting systems
play an important role in helping management and others evaluate a
company’s ability to identify and manage ESG risks and create
sustainable value over time.
As accountants, we are expert in
financial capital, management information, and accounting standards. But
I would strongly argue that the stocks and flows, impacts and
dependencies of other forms of capital are equally – if not even more –
important in the 21st century to understanding value creation.
I
argue that we are not accounting for sustainability, value, equity and
ultimately, survival. Sure, we might be compliant with the letter of the
existing rules as professionals, but we have a duty to act in the
public interest, and I feel that today, we are failing in this
fundamental duty.
With that in mind, what can we do in our day-to-day lives to fulfil our professional duties?
Keep abreast of the ever-changing landscape
2020 marked the five-year anniversary of the Paris Agreement and UN SDGs and the three-year anniversary of the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
These are fuelling many governments to set out expectations for
companies to adopt accounting, financial and reporting approaches
designed to support the transition to a more sustainable future. For
example, the EU’s non-financial reporting directive (NFRD) update is
planned to be adopted by the European Commission in Q1 2021. In a significant move, Canada, New Zealand and the UK are looking to make climate disclosure mandatory for large companies and financial institutions.
Work is also underway to harmonise the so-called non-financial reporting landscape: the big voluntary standard makers announced their intention to work together; the World Economic Forum launched streamlined ESG indicators; and the IFRS Foundation and IOSCO expressed
strong interest in taking a role in sustainability. Chartered
Accountants must stay ahead of the curve to ensure that compliance does
not create a burden, but unlocks insights into the company’s ability to
create value for all stakeholders.
Identifying risks, opportunities, and strategies
Companies
need to understand and manage ESG-related risks. As well as maximising
the potential for $12 trillion in business opportunities, we have seen
companies issue profit warnings and file for bankruptcy due to
ESG-related events. BASF issued profit warnings due to low water levels in the Rhine river, which affected transportation and production in 2018 impacting Solvay, Shell and many other companies as well. Said to be the first known climate change bankruptcy, PG&E filed for bankruptcy in 2019 following California’s drought and forest fires.
However,
44% of companies show some alignment between what they say is material
in their sustainability report and what they disclose in their legal
risk filings. In practice, this means relevant risks are not being
properly disclosed or considered in strategic decision-making. As
trusted advisors, Chartered Accountants must provide decision-useful
information for both management and investors to make the right resource
and financial allocations.
Focusing on materiality
The
misalignment in reporting mentioned above is just one indication of the
dilemmas companies and others face in determining which ESG matters
represent sufficiently serious impacts and dependencies, and over which
timescales, to threaten corporate performance.
The concept of materiality is developing. The EU has introduced its double-materiality that
takes account of the significance of ESG issues affecting the company’s
development, performance and position (sometimes known as “outside-in”
materiality) and the significance of the impact of the company’s
activities on the environment and society (sometimes known as
“inside-out” materiality). We are in a crucial position to ensure that
both types of material information get captured, managed, and
demonstrated to our key stakeholders.
Providing robust information
The number of signatories to the UN Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) grew to over 3,000 globally in 2020. Strengthening the investment case, several studies have shown no negative impact of including ESG considerations in the investment selection criteria. Furthermore, companies are likely to generate better returns
when they manage ESG issues well. With these trends, we must ensure
that the ESG information produced is of high-level, decision-useful
quality for internal and external decision-making and that our companies
can profit from a lower cost of capital due to more robust management
of risks like ESG.
Accounting for ESG matters is not a rejection
of traditional accounting. It builds on concepts such as accounting for
externalities, which have been in circulation for a century. Many
studies in the public domain criticise accounting (at a corporate and
national level) for mismeasurement, using deficient metrics that ignore
ecological and social depreciation and amortisation. However, the IASB has made it clear that we have existing tools in our armoury of standards to account for ESG risks.
This
is a new chapter for Chartered Accountants. We need to embrace the ESG
agenda, skill ourselves sufficiently to be competent and honour our
profession’s call to act in the public interest. We can be architects of
the future, building on our heritage and developing a new accounting
language so that new knowledge will emerge to secure both reward and
survival. We should, and we must, enhance and share our unique and
important skills to help decision-makers understand and act on this new
reality.
Ensuring sustainability information is decision-useful: new guidance coming on assurance
Investors
are increasingly looking for third-party assurance of sustainability
information. The problem is that, unlike auditing financial statements,
the market for sustainability assurance is unregulated and practice is
inconsistent – even though standards do exist. To strengthen practice,
the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB) is
developing guidance to assist practitioners with the critical challenges
in assuring sustainability information. A primary focus is on report
users’ needs to ensure that they can use the information with
confidence. The IAASB expects to issue its final guidance in March after
an extensive consultation process. Once launched, the guidance will be
promoted through the global network of over 170 professional accounting
bodies, which are required through the International Federation of
Accountants’ membership criteria to follow international standards.
The
World Business Council on Sustainable Development (WBCSD) has been
instrumental in driving greater credibility in sustainability through
its assurance project. In addition to working with the IAASB, WBCSD has
produced the freely available Buyers’ Guide to help companies procuring
external assurance, guidance on internal controls over sustainability
information, and a study of investors’ needs when reviewing
sustainability assurance. These tools aim to help practitioners,
companies and investors have greater confidence in sustainability
reporting so that the information, regardless of what report it appears
in, can be relied upon for decision-making.
WBCSD
© WBCSD - World Business Council for Sustainable Development
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article