Key questions are explored in the recently launched joint guide from GRI and SASB, which is built around interviews with four global companies that use both sets of standards together to meet their disclosure needs.
Experiences using GRI and SASB Standards together
How can organizations respond to their needs for improved
information on sustainability risks, as well as growing external
expectations for transparency? And how can more comprehensive reporting
help them adapt to responsible business practices?
Here we
take a look at some of the insights shared by these companies.
As the importance of sustainability issues becomes more widely
understood, the demand for organizations to be transparent about their
performance and impacts increases. And, as the interviewees make clear,
the backdrop of the COVID-19 pandemic is only increasing the urgency for
companies to demonstrate they are embracing more resilient and
sustainable ways of working.
Communicate both your positive and negative impacts
Comprehensive sustainability reporting means that companies
should not shy away from disclosure on more challenging topics or
themes.
As Esther An, Chief Sustainability Officer of City Developments Limited (CDL), puts it: “a
sustainability report is not a PR report. So don’t expect me just to
highlight the positive; I will be truthful and report the areas for
improvement as well.”
Kris Frederickson, Manager, Sustainability Disclosure &
Engagement at Suncor Energy, agrees that GRI and SASB can help identify
areas to work on. He says: “If the standards can highlight challenges or opportunities for improvement, we should take advantage of them.”
Be prepared to respond to new regulations
There are increasing requirements for environmental, social and
governance (ESG) reporting that are being introduced or proposed, in
markets around the world – both at national and regional levels.
Stricter guidance and regulation are likely to change the landscape
in the future, according to the interviewees. The pressure will come not
just from legislators but increasingly from stakeholder groups,
particularly investors and other companies in the value chain.
Harriet Howey, Global Non-Financial Reporting and ESG Lead at Diageo, highlights that: “it’s
going to become more regulated, so people should try to get ahead of
the regulations now. There are so many consultations out there. It’s
another reason that people should be thinking about reporting.”
Expect investor interest to continue to rise
The general consensus of the interviewees is that attention on
ESG matters is increasing, from multiple stakeholders. Investor
interest, in particular, stands out – both in response to emerging
regulation and the recognition of these issues as being relevant to
financial performance and enterprise value.
Looking ahead, Esther points out that: “sustainability reporting and overall disclosure will be growing,
definitely. But it will probably be more succinct, focusing on
important issues, and investors have to say more about what they want.”
Access the benefits that come with global standards
These dynamics all point to rapidly changing demands for
sustainability information. And with interest in a company’s
sustainability impacts and performance growing among a diverse range of
stakeholders, reporting standards also need to keep pace and evolve.
Reflecting on the role of different standards, Sharon Basel, Senior
Manager Sustainability Reporting & ESG Strategy, GM, says: “GRI
drives the discussion and the narrative about how a company is managing
the material issues to all stakeholders, where SASB is more focused
purely on financial materiality.”
GRI and SASB Standards seek to meet these needs in a complementary
way, providing guidance and resources that enable companies to
effectively communicate with a broad range of stakeholders – both now
and in the future.
GRI
© GRI - Global Reporting Initiative
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article