ACCA believes that the policies that will achieve net zero emissions by 2050 need to be much more ambitious than they have been so far.
ACCA (the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants) is calling
for more ambitious policies to achieve net zero emissions by 2050,
targeting green infrastructure investment from the public and private
sector and a form of carbon pricing. Early and global action on this, as
well as the right incentives and support are necessary, says the global
body.
Recent events, including devastating floods in China,
Europe and north east US, forest fires in Greece and California have
underscored the need to act on climate change. In the 2015 Paris Agreement,
countries agreed to ‘holding the increase in the global average
temperature to well below 2°C above pre-industrial levels’ to avert
catastrophic outcomes, and this will require bringing net greenhouse gas
emissions to zero by 2050.
Michael Taylor, ACCA’s chief economist of says: ‘The importance
of the delayed UN Conference on Climate Change COP26 meeting scheduled
to take place in Glasgow soon cannot be overstated. As we say in a white paper
briefing published today, ACCA believes that the policies that will
achieve net zero emissions by 2050 need to be much more ambitious than
they have been so far.’
For ACCA, global and EU policy-makers and governments have a crucial
role in reducing carbon emissions through regulation, the provision of
green infrastructure and appropriately targeted subsidies. But as with so much policy designed to change economic behaviour, the
adoption of early and anticipated policy changes is the most effective
approach. Such policies also need to be pursued at a global level.
Michael Taylor explains: ‘Recent ECOFIN’s conclusions on climate finance
say that carbon pricing and phasing out environmentally harmful fossil
fuel subsidies are key in achieving net zero commitments. We could not
agree more. A shift from fossil fuels to low carbon energy requires the
replacement of existing carbon-intensive capital with low-carbon
capital. Our recommended strategy to reach these ambitious goals
involves two key elements: green infrastructure investment from the
public and private sector and a form of carbon pricing.
‘ACCA is calling on a global minimum carbon price, as
in an integrated global economy unilateral action by individual
countries has limits. While substantial progress to net zero can only be
made by the bigger emitters such as China, the US and EU reaching that
goal themselves, net zero will still be missed unless emerging markets
also reduce emissions. The challenge is however much greater for
emerging markets striving also for faster economic growth and higher
living standards’, he adds.
Carbon pricing can take the form either of a straightforward tax that
raises the price to a certain level or in an emissions trading scheme
(ETS) ‘cap and trade’ where the quantity of CO2 emissions is set and
permits issued for this quantity. In either case, raising the price of
carbon provides incentives to transition towards low carbon alternatives
and away from fossil fuels.
However, a limiting factor in the geographical spread and level of carbon pricing is the risk of ‘carbon leakage'. One way of correcting this is through Border Carbon Adjustments,
which in effect are import tariffs that raise the import prices of
energy intensive goods such that they include the carbon price applied
to domestic producers.
Michael Taylor concludes: ‘In July the EU announced its intention to introduce a Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism
(CBAM) covering iron and steel, cement, aluminium, electricity and
fertiliser. An alternative approach than CBAMs favoured by ACCA would be
an agreed global minimum price of carbon, which would allow for a lower
carbon price floor for countries with lower per capita incomes in
recognition of differing responsibilities between countries.’
ACCA
© ACCA - Association of Chartered Certified Accountants
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article