The long-term nature of climate risks, the uncertainty about how these risks will manifest over time as well as their mutual interdependence pose a significant challenge.
It is now almost universally agreed that the impact of climate
change will prompt fundamental changes to the global economy, including
the financial sector. The financial system can play a crucial role in
financing the transition towards a climate-neutral economy, but at the
same time it may be prone to climate-related risks that need proper
management. In view of the upcoming COP 26 UN meeting and drawing on ECB
analytical work, Wouter Coussens, Irene Heemskerk, Wieger Kastelein and Michael Wedow argue that additional tools and ambitious policy reforms are needed to reach both objectives.
The long-term nature of climate risks, the uncertainty about how
these risks will manifest over time as well as their mutual
interdependence pose a significant challenge. Climate-related risks to
the economy and financial sector are usually divided into two
categories. Physical risk is the economic impact stemming from the
expected increase of natural hazards, both in frequency and magnitude.
Transition risk refers to the impact of the potential delayed and abrupt
implementation of climate policies to reduce CO2 emissions.
There is uncertainty both around the evolution of the climate itself and
about future policies to mitigate climate change. The two risks are not
isolated but closely interlinked; e.g. while climate policies,
especially if abruptly implemented, may pose risks to certain high
polluting sectors, they may reduce physical risks over the
medium-to-long term.
While the primary responsibility and powers to mitigate climate
change lie with governments, central banks also have a role to play.
Central banks could contribute to avoid so called ‘green swan’ risks,
i.e. potentially extremely disruptive financial events triggered by
climate-related risks that could trigger a financial crisis. To achieve
this objective, a better understanding of climate-related risks is
essential, accompanied by dedicated analyses to quantify the potential
impacts of climate mitigation policies on the overall economy. At the
same time, given the key role of the financial sector to mobilise funds
towards more sustainable investments, central banks can play a
supporting role to transitioning towards a greener economy.
In order to shed light on the risks for the financial system, the
European Central Bank (ECB) conducted an economy-wide climate stress
test that models climate risks over the coming decades. A stress test is
a tool that investigates how banks would be affected under severe but
plausible future economic scenarios. The ECB economy-wide climate stress test
pushes out the analytical frontier by extending the time horizon to
thirty years, by considering both transition and physical risks in the
definition of the future economic scenarios, and by using very granular
data. It covers approximately four million companies worldwide and 1,600
consolidated banking groups in the euro area.
The results
show that euro area firms and banks could be severely affected in a
scenario where climate change is not addressed (see Figure 1). In 2050,
the average corporate loan portfolio of a euro area bank is almost 8%
more likely to default under the hot house world scenario than under an
orderly transition scenario. Additionally, banks most vulnerable to
climate risk are 30% more likely to default in 2050 compared with 2020
under the hot house world scenario: this increase is about five times
larger than the increase of an average bank under the same scenario....
more at LSE
© LSE
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article