Crypto assets offer a new world of opportunities: Quick and easy payments. Innovative financial services. Inclusive access to previously “unbanked” parts of the world. All are made possible by the crypto ecosystem.
As crypto assets take hold, regulators need to step up.
Consumer protection risks remain substantial given limited or inadequate disclosure and oversight.
But along with the opportunities come challenges and risks. The latest Global Financial Stability Report describes the risks posed by the crypto ecosystem and offers some policy options to help navigate this uncharted territory.
The Crypto Ecosystem—What Is It, What’s at Risk?
The total market value of all the crypto assets surpassed $2 trillion
as of September 2021—a 10-fold increase since early 2020. An entire
ecosystem is also flourishing, replete with exchanges, wallets, miners,
and stablecoin issuers.
Many of these entities lack strong operational, governance, and risk
practices. Crypto exchanges, for instance, have faced significant
disruptions during periods of market turbulence. There are also several
high-profile cases of hacking-related thefts of customer funds. So far,
these incidents have not had a significant impact on financial
stability. However, as crypto assets become more mainstream, their
im
Consumer protection risks remain substantial given limited or
inadequate disclosure and oversight. For example, more than 16,000
tokens have been listed in various exchanges and around 9,000
exist today, while the rest have disappeared in some form. For example,
many of them have no volumes or the developers have walked away from
the project. Some were likely created solely for speculation purposes or
even outright fraud.
The (pseudo) anonymity of crypto assets also creates data gaps for
regulators and can open unwanted doors for money laundering, as well as
terrorist financing. Although authorities may be able to trace illicit
transactions, they may not be able to identify the parties to such
transactions. Additionally, the crypto ecosystem falls under different
regulatory frameworks in different countries, making coordination more
challenging. For example, most transactions on crypto exchanges happen
through entities that operate primarily in offshore financial centers.
This makes supervision and enforcement not only challenging, but nearly
impossible without international collaboration.
Stablecoins—which aim to peg their value usually against the US
dollar—are also growing at lightning speed, with their supply climbing
4-fold throughout 2021 to reach $120 billion. The term “stablecoin,”
however, captures a very diverse group of crypto assets and can be
misleading. Given the composition of their reserves, some stablecoins
could be subject to runs, with knock-on effects to the financial system.
The runs could be driven by investor concerns about the quality of
their reserves or the speed at which reserves can be liquidated to meet
potential redemptions.
Significant challenges ahead
Although the extent of the adoption of
crypto assets is difficult to measure, surveys and other measures
suggest that emerging market and developing economies may be leading the
way. Most notably, residents in these countries increased their trading
volumes in crypto exchanges sharply in 2021.
Looking ahead, widespread and rapid
adoption can pose significant challenges by reinforcing dollarization
forces in the economy—or in this case cryptoization—where residents
start using crypto assets instead of the local currency. Cryptoization
can reduce the ability of central banks to effectively implement
monetary policy. It could also create financial stability risks, for
example through funding and solvency risks arising from currency
mismatches, as well as amplify the importance of some of the previously
mentioned risks to consumer protection and financial integrity.
Threats to fiscal policy could also
intensify, given the potential for crypto assets to facilitate tax
evasion. And seigniorage (the profits accruing from the right to issue
currency) may also decline. Increased demand for crypto assets could
also facilitate capital outflows that impact the foreign exchange
market.
Finally, a migration of crypto “mining”
activity out of China to other emerging market and developing economies
can have an important impact on domestic energy use—especially in
countries that rely on more C02-intensive forms of energy, as well as those that subsidize energy costs—given the large amount of energy needed for mining activities.
Policy action
As a first step, regulators and supervisors
need to be able to monitor rapid developments in the crypto ecosystem
and the risks they create by swiftly tackling data gaps. The global
nature of crypto assets means that policymakers should enhance
cross-border coordination to minimize the risks of regulatory arbitrage
and ensure effective supervision and enforcement.
National regulators should also prioritize
the implementation of existing global standards. Standards focused on
crypto assets are currently mostly limited to money laundering and
proposals on bank exposures. However, other international standards—in
areas such as securities regulation, as well as payments, clearing and
settlements may also be applicable and need attention.
As the role of stablecoins grows,
regulations should be proportionate to the risks they pose and the
economic functions they serve. For example, rules should be aligned with
entities that provide similar products (e.g., bank deposits or money
market funds).
In some emerging markets and developing
economies, cryptoization can be driven by weak central bank credibility,
vulnerable banking systems, inefficiencies in payment systems and
limited access to financial services. Authorities should prioritize
strengthening macroeconomic policies and consider the benefits of
issuing central bank digital currencies and improving payment systems.
Central bank digital currencies may help reduce cryptoization pressures
if they help satisfy a need for better payment technologies.
Globally, policymakers should prioritize
making cross-border payments faster, cheaper, more transparent and
inclusive through the G20 Cross Border Payments Roadmap.
Time is of the essence, and action needs to
be decisive, swift and well-coordinated globally to allow the benefits
to flow but, at the same time, also address the vulnerabilities.
IMF
© International Monetary Fund
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article