MEPs said that risks with an unregulated crypto market are not the blockchain technology but governance failures, calling for the rapid implementation of EU rules for crypto.
Discussing the FTX collapse on
Wednesday, MEPs from the Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee
highlighted governance flaws in the case, including a lack of an
internal reporting mechanism and corporate controls, as well as no
segregation between the company’s and clients’ assets. They also called
for new EU rules on crypto-assets (MiCA) to be passed as quickly as possible and implemented diligently.
MEPs quizzed the European Commission and the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA)
about whether a similar failure could happen under the MiCA. They also
wanted to understand how FTX Europe could have operated from Cyprus
under a MIFID
license, which does not cover crypto transactions. Additionally, MEPs
asked about cooperation with international partners and next steps at
the global level.
The Commission representative said that
under the MiCA both good governance and investor protection measures
would be required and highlighted the fact that it was largely customers
outside the EU that were affected as the FTX was a global crypto-asset
conglomerate. To ensure EU protection is not crippled in a different
jurisdiction, the Commission stressed the importance of global
cooperation and pointed to their work advertising MiCA to global fora
such as G7 and bilaterally with the UK, Canada and Korea.
The ESMA speaker explained that as the
MIFID licence in Cyprus fully covered MIFID services and transactions
but was not suitable for crypto assets, it was suspended by Cypriot
authorities on 9 November. He agreed that despite many problems in the
crypto-assets market, such as market abuse, lack of control and
aggressive advertising to retail clients, the crypto industry is still
not properly supervised. There is however cooperation between the ESMA
crypto assets task force and national authorities on a case by case
basis, in order to allow for more harmonised supervision and a warning
system. Additionally, ESMA issues warnings to investors on the severe
risks posed by a crypto asset. The ESMA speaker stressed that there is
no significant risk of major spillover to traditional financial sector.
Finally, taking into account volatility
on crypto markets and the market’s rapid changes, MEPs discussed whether
MiCA has enough firepower to deal with crypto conglomerates, and what
regulatory tools can address current threats before the law enters into
force in 2024. They also urged the ESMA to use where possible its
product intervention powers to block certain crypto products threatening
the single market and investor protection in the EU.
ECON
© European Parliament
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article