Why complaints about Apple’s walled garden are multiplying. THERE IS NOT yet an app to keep track of the growing number of antitrust complaints against Apple. But perhaps there should be.
On May 2nd the European Commission, the EU’s executive
arm, added another to the pile. Following an investigation begun in
2020, it sent the smartphone-maker a “statement of objections”, saying
that, in the commission’s view, Apple is abusing its power in the market for smartphone payments.
At
issue is Apple Pay, a contactless-payment service introduced in 2014.
Apple Pay uses a specialised radio called a Near-Field Communication
(NFC) chip to allow an iPhone to work like a contactless credit card.
Users who have loaded their banking details onto their phones can wave
them at contactless-payment terminals—or even other iPhones—to pay for
things. Apple collects a fee from the user’s bank for each transaction.
The service has quickly become popular:
in 2020 Bernstein, a financial firm, estimated Apple Pay accounted for
about 5% of global card transactions, and forecast that it might reach
10% by 2025. The problem, in the commission’s view, is that iOS, the
operating system used by iPhones, allows only Apple’s own mobile-wallet
software to make use of the NFC chip. That freezes out rivals who might
want to build competing payment apps of their own. Android, a rival
smartphone operating system maintained by Google, does allow third-party
apps access to a phone’s NFC chip, meaning that Android users can
choose contactless-capable smart wallets from firms such as Google,
Samsung, PayPal and others. (Complaints from PayPal in particular are
thought to be at least one reason for the commission’s investigation.)
The
commission’s findings are only preliminary. But if a full-blown
investigation comes to the same conclusion, Apple would be in breach of
European competition laws, and exposed—at least in theory—to hefty fines
of up to 10% of its worldwide turnover. The firm will have further
chances to argue its corner, both in writing and in person, before the
commission issues a final decision, a process that could take many
months....
more at The Economist
© The Economist
Key
![](Images/bluesquare.png)
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
![](Images/info_small.png)
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article