He looks at the impact of ‘crypto’ on the stability of the UK’s financial system. ...unbacked crypto-assets (eg Bitcoin) and backed crypto-assets for payments (stablecoins) have begun to connect to the financial system. ...and talks about how regulators are responding to their rapid growth.
Cryptoassets have grown by roughly 200% in 2021, from just under $800
billion to $2.3 trillion today. They have grown from just $16 billion 5
years ago. $2.3 trillion of course needs to be seen in the context of
the $250 trillion global financial system. But as the financial crisis
showed us, you don’t have to account for a large proportion of the
financial sector to trigger financial stability problems – sub-prime was
valued at around $1.2 trillion in 2008.
When
something in the financial system is growing very fast, and growing in
largely unregulated space, financial stability authorities have to sit
up and take notice. They have to think very carefully about what could
happen and whether they, or other regulatory authorities, need to act.
At
the same time, they need to be careful not to over-react – particularly
when faced with the unfamiliar. We should not classify new approaches
as ‘dangerous’ simply because they are different. Innovation, technology
and new players can tackle longstanding frictions and inefficiencies
and reduce barriers to entry. Throughout history, they have been key to
driving improvement and to increasing resilience in financial services.
I
will give you my conclusions at the outset. Crypto technologies offer a
prospect of radical improvements in financial services. However, while
the financial stability risks are still limited, their current
applications are now a financial stability concern for a number of
reasons.
Cryptoassets are growing fast and there is rapid
development of new applications for the technology. The bulk of these
assets have no intrinsic value and are vulnerable to major price
corrections. The crypto world is beginning to connect to the traditional
financial system and we are seeing the emergence of leveraged players.
And, crucially, this is happening in largely unregulated space.
Financial
stability risks currently are relatively limited but they could grow
very rapidly if, as I expect, this area continues to develop and expand
at pace. How large those risks could grow will depend in no small part
on the nature and on the speed of the response by regulatory and
supervisory authorities.
I will explain today what lies behind
these conclusions and what they imply. First, however, we need to
explore what lies behind the ‘crypto’ label in the financial system.
Crypto
itself is the underlying technology – the application of cryptographic
innovation to the recording and to the transfer of the ownership of
assets, often on public networks open to all. Recording and transferring
ownership of assets is the bedrock of the financial system’s role in
storing value and in making transactions. Crypto technology enables –
though it does not require - recording and transfer to take place
without the banks or custodians that have historically carried out this
function.
Within finance, the crypto label covers a multitude of
different innovations in financial assets, markets and services. From a
financial stability and from a regulatory perspective, what matters is
not the underlying technology but how it is used and for what purpose.
In other words, we should not regulate technologies but rather the
activities the technology is performing. And in doing so, we need to
ensure a consistent approach to risks, regardless of the technology
used.
I will not attempt a detailed taxonomy of all the crypto
innovations in the financial sector - in all probability a few will have
been added by the time I have finished speaking. But in order to
discuss the most prominent risks, it is worth breaking them down into
unbacked cryptoassets used primarily as speculative investments and
backed cryptoassets intended for use as a means of payment. I will also
touch briefly on the recent development of decentralised crypto
platforms and markets that are beginning to offer a broad range of
financial services.
Unbacked cryptoassets
Unbacked
cryptoassets make up nearly 95% of the $2.3 trillion. They are
essentially non-replicable strings of computer code that can be owned
and transferred without intermediaries. Bitcoin, of course, is the most
prominent example, but there are now nearly eight thousand unbacked
cryptoassets in existence. These have no intrinsic value – that is to
say there are no assets or commodities behind them: the value of the
cryptoasset is determined solely by the price a buyer is prepared to pay
at any given moment....
more at Bank of England
© Bank of England
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article