According to our analysis, the optimal amount of CBDC in circulation for the case of the euro area lies between 15% and 45% of quarterly GDP. Optimal CBDC rules are effective in mitigating the risk of bank disintermediation and induce significant welfare gains.
Early evidence from an event study
suggests that the expected impact of issuing a digital euro on bank
profitability and lending depends on the bank’s reliance on deposit
funding and the amount of digital euro in circulation. This is due to a
perceived degree of substitutability between central bank digital
currencies (CBDCs) and bank deposits, which in normal times are a
relatively cheap form of bank funding. In this SUERF policy note we use a
macro-banking DSGE model calibrated to quarterly data of the euro area
economy to investigate optimal CBDC rules.
In recent years, the use of cash for
transactions has significantly declined, while the demand for digital
means of payment for retail purposes has steadily increased (Auer et al.
2020). In response, central banks have started to investigate the
implications of issuing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs). One of
the important challenges of issuing a CBDC is the risk of bank
disintermediation through deposit substitution (Carapella and Flemming
2020; Niepelt 2021). Much of the current policy debate focuses on how to
calibrate the amount of CBDC in circulation to ensure that the
potential benefits of CBDC materialize without harming monetary and
financial stability through bank disintermediation (Bindseil and Panetta
2020; Jamet et al. 2022). One challenge in this regard is that advanced
economies have no experience with CBDCs and, hence, there is no
available data on which empirical analysis can be performed. For this
reason, the literature has focused mainly on studying the implications
of CBDCs within theoretical models.
In this SUERF policy note, we present
some novel empirical evidence on the expected impact of CBDC on bank
profitability and lending behavior and report on the development of a
quantitative DSGE model that allows us to investigate the relevant
trade-offs. The findings underscore the importance of adequately
calibrating the amount of CBDC in circulation.1
Evidence: The impact of digital euro news on bank stock prices and lending behaviour
Early empirical evidence on the impact
of digital euro news on bank stock prices and lending behaviour suggests
that market participants perceive a certain degree of substitutability
between deposits and CBDC and that the extent to which this may have a
bearing on banks’ lending conditions depends on their reliance on
deposit funding and the design of the CBDC.
The response of bank valuations to news
about the digital euro project provides insights as to what market
participants expect the effect of a digital euro on bank profitability
to be. Figure 1 shows the cumulated impact of digital
euro news on abnormal returns on euro area banks’ stock prices. Banks’
valuation decreased after the ECB stated its intention to intensify work
on a digital euro in early October 2020 (ECB 2020a; ECB 2020b).2
The drop was concentrated among banks with a higher reliance on deposit
funding, and was later reabsorbed in early February 2021 when potential
limits on individual holdings and other qualifications about the
digital euro project that may mitigate deposit substitution were
conveyed to the public.3
The reaction of stock prices may have
conveyed information about the impact that the digital euro project may
have on the business model of banks that rely heavily on deposit
funding. Moreover, an adverse assessment by market participants as to
the prospects of a given bank in a world with a digital euro may have
also directly translated into more expensive market-based funding
options for that bank, ultimately exerting pressure on bank lending
conditions. Developments in corporate loan markets measured with
transaction level data from AnaCredit (the European credit register)
suggest that one percentage point drop in stock market returns
attributable to digital euro news was associated with a decrease in loan
volumes of over 0.3% (Figure 2). Consistent with the
recovery of stock market returns observed since early February 2021, the
impact on lending disappeared following the discussion of possibly
restricting the amount of CBDC in circulation. ... more
Author(s): Lorenzo Burlon, Carlos Montes-Galdón, Manuel A Muñoz, Frank Smets
full paper
SUERF
© SUERF
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article