The European Parliament will fight to loosen the conditionality required from national governments in order to receive money from the EU recovery fund, according to the negotiating position MEPs will adopt in the coming days.
The four biggest political groups – the European People’s Party
(EPP), the Socialists (S&D), the Liberals and the Greens – reached
an agreement last Friday (30 October) on the details of the Recovery and
Resilience Facility, the main pillar of the EU’s €750 billion recovery
fund.
This new facility will mobilise up to €672.5 billion in loans and
grants to support member states investment and reforms proposals to
tackle the impact of the COVID-19 crisis.
The four groups’ backing will secure enough votes in the Parliament’s
Economic and Monetary Affairs committee on 9 November, and the plenary
session in mid-November.
Once the Parliament’s proposal is adopted, MEPs will enter into
negotiations with the Council, representing the EU27, to agree on the
details of the facility.
Both sides hope to reach an agreement this month. But the recovery
funds will not be transferred to member states until the second half of
2021, as national parliaments have to authorise the borrowing needed to
finance the recovery instrument.
In today’s Special Edition of the Capitals, find out more about EU
member states’ priorities when it comes to their national recovery plans
which were supposed to be submitted to the European Commission on
Thursday (15 October), as well as so much more.
The most controversial issue is the conditionality that EU governments need to fulfil to access the recovery funds.
The Council requested that the Commission’s evaluation of the plans
should take into account recommendations related to the Green and
Digital agenda, the EU’s big priorities, but also fiscal aspects, and
whether the national plans are “expected to effectively contribute to
strengthen the growth potential, job creation and economic and social
resilience of the member state, mitigate the economic and social impact
of the crisis and contribute to enhancing economic, social and
territorial cohesion”.
The Parliament, however, maintains that member states’ investment and
reform plans need to follow only those recommendations that are
relevant to overcome the impact of the pandemic, under six priorities:
Green agenda, digital transition, social cohesion, industrial strategy
and SME support, modernisation of Public Administration, and Youth.
The Parliament’s rapporteur, Eider Gardiazabal (S&D, Spain),
argued that their position on the Recovery and Resilience Facility “is
more concrete, more social, greener and more flexible” than the
Commission and the Council’s proposal.
“More social, because it allows funding for the European Pillar of
Social Rights, and places a very important weight on gender policy.
Greener, because we have increased the investment target in the fight
against climate change to 40%, and more flexible with the participation
of the European Semester,” she explained.
The Parliament also scrapped the possibility of suspending the disbursement of the recovery funds
if member states incur a serious violation of their deficit and debt
reduction targets under the Stability and Growth Pact.
The Council included a clause (Article 9) which foresaw this
possibility, in line with the Cohesion Funds rules, although it would be
inoperative at least until the end of 2021, given that the Stability
and Growth Pact is suspended while the pandemic is ongoing.
Gardiazabal explained that “it is not the right time now to think
about macroeconomic conditionality”, given that the EU’s fiscal rules
are paused and the Stability and Growth Pact is in the process of being
reviewed.
Prefinancing
The Parliament also doubled to 20% the prefinancing that member
states could access from their recovery funds envelope once their
national plans are received by the Commission.
The Recovery and Resilience Facility is one of the three ongoing
negotiations between the Council and the Parliament to launch the big
economic stimulus against the COVID-19 pandemic.
Both sides are close to finding an agreement on the Rule of Law
conditionality that will be attached to the EU funds. A deal could be
reached during the next round scheduled for Thursday.
The European Parliament and the Council were close to reaching an
agreement on Thursday (29 October) on the Rule of Law conditionality
attached to EU funds, but they continued to disagree on how to trigger
the mechanism.
The MEPs and the member states are, however, finding more
difficulties to progress on the multi-annual financial framework (MFF),
the EU’s seven-year budget totalling 1.074 trillion. The Parliament
requested extra funds for 15 programmes cut by EU leaders last summer,
including €13 billion of ‘fresh money’ to cover the interest payments of
the recovery fund.
The Council is only open to consider reallocating unspent funds
towards these priority programmes, such as Erasmus, health or
innovation.
EURACTIV
© EURACTIV
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article