This election is unlikely to usher in much change, even though it has arguably been the most unpredictable election cycle in nearly 20 years.
German
national elections are always of special interest in European
politics. Germany’s next chancellor, whoever that may be, will
represent the EU’s undisputed economic behemoth. But, like last time,
this election is unlikely to usher in much change, even though it has
arguably been the most unpredictable election cycle in nearly 20 years.
The background to this election is a paradox: Many outside Germany
believe that the country has weathered the Covid-19 crisis better than
almost all its European peers. But German voters think differently. They
perceive that the country has only ‘muddled through’ the crisis, with
Germany’s federal system creating a continuous battle over competences
between the federal and Länder (state) levels, resulting in a
bewildering patchwork of local Covid rules and restrictions.
Moreover, the slow reaction to the recent floods has uncovered an
unusual degree of inefficiency in local administrations. The current
crisis has also brought to the surface the backwardness of Germany’s
public administration in terms of digitisation. Consequently, there is
widespread dissatisfaction amongst the German electorate with how the
country functions. The new government will thus be less inclined to view
their own country as an example for others to follow.
Consensus and the chancellor
Much speculation has concentrated on who will become the next
Chancellor. This is misguided. In the German political system, the
personal opinions of the chancellor are of only secondary importance.
Important decisions are taken by groups representing the coalition
parties, which in turn are influenced by their party members and various
pressure groups. In a scenario where Germany will have a three-party
coalition for the first time in its post-1945 history, the role and
influence of the chancellor will be even more diluted.
The only real circumstance when the personal opinions (and choices)
of the Chancellor become crucial is when the European Council has to
take emergency decisions in a crisis. During the eurocrisis, Chancellor
Merkel agreed to take certain policy actions which the Bundestag was
essentially forced to ratify because ‘there was simply no alternative’.
There is a consensus among the elite and all likely governing parties
that Germany has to remain ‘pro-European’. In contrast to other large
member states, there is no strong ‘Eurosceptic’ party or undercurrent in
Germany. Whilst menacing to many, the Alternative für Deutschland
(AfD) simply does not have the same strength or influence, as say,
Italy’s La Lega, and will not break out of the cordon sanitaire that
the other parties have erected around it. On the other side of the
political spectrum, Die Linke (‘The Left’) is also somewhat Eurosceptic
but is not expected to be a governing party… however, bringing them into
the fold is something that the SPD has not 100% categorically ruled
out.
Alas, with few major ideological differences between the mainstream
parties most likely to come together in coalition, some minor changes in
political position or tone may occur but really, no radical change is
on the menu, especially regarding Germany’s pro-European stance. The
centre-ground, in short, will hold.
A focus on three key policy areas
There are three key areas though where the new government could drive some concrete, if not truly revolutionary, changes.
The first, arguably the most pressing, is obviously the Green
transition. Germany under Merkel has always rhetorically supported EU
climate policies but the country has also fought a rearguard action to
defend its energy intensive industries and the automobile sector.
Merkel despite, her title of ‘Klimakanzlerin’ (‘climate chancellor’),
has presided over a government that has always been quite ambiguous when
it came to concrete policy choices. This is now likely to change,
especially if the Greens form part of the new government as a junior
partner to the SPD. The German position on the concrete measures needed
to achieve the EU’s ambitious climate agenda should become more
cohesive.
Financial and economic matters are where we can expect the most
change (but still less than many assume is likely to materialise). SPD
leader, current Finance Minister and possibly the next chancellor Olaf
Scholz, once remarked that even though he may be more sympathetic to
European integration than his “tight-fisted” predecessor, he’s “still
the Finance Minister of Germany”. What he means is that no German leader
can hand over taxpayer’s cash for European projects, unless it’s
definitely in Germany’s interests to do so.
A frugal Germany will remain an obstacle to a more active fiscal
policy – in no large part because such frugality remains very popular
with German voters. Perhaps there will be a little loosening of the
purse strings for ‘green’ investments… but again, don’t bet the farm on a
radical shift in German economic policy.
Finally, the policy area that is still high on the agenda following
Afghanistan and Aukus – foreign and defence policy. Germany is likely to
remain – on paper – supportive of a more wide-reaching European Foreign
Policy but without full German assent, building ‘hard power’
instruments for the EU will simply not happen.
Given that the SPD membership opposes drones for the Bundeswehr and
the Greens are not keen at all on any increase in military expenditure
to reach the 2% NATO spending ceiling, a new government led by these
parties may well result in no real progress towards ‘hard’ EU military
capabilities, regardless of how much the current geopolitical
environment deems them desirable. But then again, with all likely
governing parties in favour of Qualified Majority Voting (QMV) in the
Council for foreign affairs and security matters, perhaps at least some
movement in the right direction could be achieved.
So yes, there’s no harm in getting excited about a genuinely
unpredictable German election – they are a rare occurrence after all.
But when the dust settles and the coalition agreement is finalised,
don’t expect the excitement to last. Germany is not a country prone to
sudden radical transformation. How the new government pivots towards
Europe and confronts the above policy areas will present a telling sign
on how committed Germany remains to its role as the unofficial leader of
the EU. Watch this space.
Sophia Russack
Daniel Gros
CEPS
© CEPS - Centre for European Policy Studies
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article