The EBA concluded that the existing EBA guidelines have not led to sufficient convergence in supervisory practices, and proposed the incorporation in its forthcoming review of the guidelines of a number of specific best practices observed. The EBA also intends to send an opinion to the European Commission suggesting a change in the underlying Capital Requirements Directive (CRD) framework.
Despite most NCAs being assessed as being fully or largely compliant with the EBA guidelines, the peer review assessment highlighted that the EBA Guidelines have not led to sufficiently convergent supervisory practices. Differences in actual practices include the definition of suitability, the criteria used by NCAs and institutions to assess the candidates' suitability, the approach regarding the suitability of key function holders and the notion of independence of members of the management body.
In addition, the report reveals some best practices observed of some NCAs, including the practice of assessing candidates for key positions by performing interviews, the application of the proportionality principle and the criteria used to assess suitability.
The EBA proposes that the current guidelines be updated to incorporate these identified best practices so as to improve the level of convergence across NCAs' practices and also to reflect its mandates under the CRD.
The EBA expects to launch a public consultation on these revised Guidelines in the first quarter of 2016. The EBA is also considering submitting an opinion to the European Commission suggesting legislative amendments that would allow for enhanced convergence of supervisory practices in this area.
Press release
EBA Peer Review Report on suitability
© EBA
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article