12 March 2015

ロイター：欧州議会の報告書、欧州委員会の銀行構造改革案を否定、自己勘定取引とマーケット・メイキングの区分が困難であること、銀行のコスト増を正当化する金融システムの安定化効果が見込めないことなどを指摘

The EU assembly and member states are trying to find consensus on a draft EU law that proposes banning proprietary trading at banks, in which they take bets in financial markets with their own money.

Regulators would also be given powers to force banks to separate some risky trading activities into separate units if financial stability was being threatened.

But Germany and the European Central Bank have already expressed concerns this could effectively break up universal banks like Deutsche Bank or harm banks' market-making activities that helps to finance the economy.

EU president Latvia has proposed a compromise giving member states more wriggle room in applying the rules but some in the European Parliament think this would hollow out the draft law.

A parliamentary committee is due to hold a vote on March 23 but a study written by the parliament's researchers for the committee raised doubts about the draft law in its entirety.

The report said market-making activities, such as enabling investors to buy and sell shares or bonds, are embedded in proprietary trading activities.

"Therefore, it is not possible to exactly segregate the pure proprietary trading positions from the proprietary trading books positions which are related to market-making," the study seen by Reuters said.

Banks are also operating at low margins, it said.

"Therefore, cost increases and further limitations to the banking activities pose a significant risk to the sustainability of the banking business," it said.

"Compliance cost and the costs of restructuring the bank’s businesses have to be weighted against the benefits of the new regulations," it said.

To be successful, the new regulation must reduce instability in the overall banking industry to outweigh the costs.

"However, the gain in financial system stability is still uncertain," the study said.

"Particularly, potential impacts of migrating trading business ... must be evaluated in its full extent. Impacts on the rate of growth will depend on the social costs and benefits of the proposed regulation."

Full article on Reuters

© Reuters