The upturn comes at a critical moment for three of them. Credit Suisse, Barclays and Deutsche Bank all have new men at the top. All have to produce better returns, and a hard look at the investment bank will have to be part of the mix. The plans are still vague. Barclays and Deutsche say they are sticking with their previous strategies, but looking to execute them better. At Credit Suisse, chief executive Tidjane Thiam is making each of the bank’s businesses fight for their share of the capital.
The model that they should follow is UBS. Three years ago, the Swiss lender decided to shrink the investment bank and focus on wealth management. The remaining part of the investment bank would focus (although not exclusively) on serving the wealth management business. Investors like it – UBS shares traded at 0.8 times book value before the changes, but have risen to 1.6 times now.
[...]
The top-down/bottom-up trade off will be different for each bank. Credit Suisse has a relatively straightforward job. Like its rival UBS, it already has a strong wealth management business, but the investment bank accounts for more than half of the group’s risk weighted assets. One of the big challenges for Mr Thiam will be to cut costs – the investment bank’s cost to income ratio was a whopping 82 per cent in the second quarter. As at the other banks, parts of fixed income trading are likely to be pared back. Although these businesses can still do well at times, post crisis regulation has made it more difficult for them to be profitable over the long term.
At Barclays, the job is slightly tougher. The investment bank has its strengths – in global debt and equity capital markets, for example, according to Dealogic data. But executive chairman John McFarlane, and whoever he picks to be the new chief executive, will have to decide where the former Lehman US business still fits in. The rest of the investment bank, and the lion’s share of the retail and commercial banking activities, are in the UK and Europe. If Mr McFarlane was starting from scratch today, would he build something that looks like Barclays does now? If not, he should think about a structure that makes more sense.
At Deutsche, the decisions are tougher still. Its investment bank accounts for almost half of the group’s risk weighted assets, and produced only a 7.5 per cent post tax return on equity in the first half. But the other main part of the bank – retail – is not strong enough to base a whole strategy around. So new chief executive John Cryan has little option but to try to improve the division. Once again, cost control will be crucial (the investment bank’s cost to income ratio was 78 per cent in the first half), but Mr Cryan also needs to think about the bigger picture. European politicians want more corporate financing to come from the capital markets. Deutsche has good positions in European debt capital markets. Could it become be a sort of European Goldman Sachs?
Credit Suisse and Deutsche have promised strategy updates by the end of the year. Barclays is even vaguer. Whatever they come up with has to be a convincing long-term plan, not simply a list of businesses in which the bank is already strong.
© Financial Times
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article