The broad aim of the G-SIB framework is to reduce the probability of failure of a G-SIB by increasing its going-concern loss absorbency. The identification methodology assesses the relative systemic importance of internationally active banks based on 12 indicators in five categories, resulting in a score that measures the systemic importance of each bank. The bank's overall score is mapped to buckets that are associated with a higher loss absorbency (HLA) capital requirement.
When the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) published the G-SIB assessment framework in July 2013, it agreed to review the framework every three years. The review is intended to enhance the framework and ensure that it remains consistent with its objectives in light of any structural changes in the global banking system that could introduce new dimensions of systemic risk not previously anticipated.
Having completed its review, the Committee is consulting on the following modifications to the framework:
-
Removal of the cap on the substitutability category;
-
Expansion of the scope of consolidation to include insurance subsidiaries;
-
Amendments to the definition of cross-jurisdictional activity;
-
Modification of the weights in the substitutability category and introduction of a trading volume indicator;
-
Revisions to the disclosure requirements;
-
Further guidance on bucket migration and the associated surcharge; and
-
A proposed transition schedule.
The Committee is also seeking feedback on the introduction of a new indicator for short-term wholesale funding.
The Committee welcomes comments by 30 June.
Press release
Full publication
© BCBS (BIS)
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article