Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn
 

09 November 2017

EBA(欧州銀行機構)、CRDIV(第4次資本要求指令)・CRR(資本要求規則)における金融機関や付随業務等の定義に関するオピニオン及び報告書を公表 


Default: Change to:


These include the use of Articles 2(5) and 9(2) CRDIV and the interpretation of the terms 'financial institution' and 'ancillary services undertaking' as defined in the CRR. The Opinion is based on the results of a detailed assessment across the EU of the prudential treatment of 'other financial intermediaries' (OFIs).


In view of the need for the regular monitoring of credit intermediation activities outside the traditional banking sector and other developments such as the emergence of FinTech, the EBA has undertaken a comprehensive analysis of issues relating to the regulatory perimeter further to the 2014 EBA Opinion and Report on the perimeter of credit institutions. 

In terms of the overall scope of the CRDIV/CRR, the EBA observes that Article 2(5) CRDIV (the list of entities excluded from scope, such as central banks and post office giro institutions) remains valid and requires minor update. Also Article 9(2) CRDIV (other exclusions, including where provided for under national law) also appears to continue to have relevance in the Member States and any amendment thereto ‎should be substantiated by a prior and thorough impact assessment.

‎As for the terms 'financial institution' and 'ancillary services undertaking', which are crucial for the purposes of establishing the scope of prudential consolidation, the EBA observes that these terms are prone to inconsistent interpretation across the EU leading to potential divergences in the application of regulatory consolidation rules.

The EBA observes that Annex I to the CRDIV, which enlists the activities subject to mutual recognition (i.e. activities that credit institutions and financial institutions are permitted to carry out throughout the EU by establishing branches or the cross-border provision of services), has been largely unchanged for 30 years and urges the EU institutions to give consideration to clarifications and updates to the Annex.

Finally, the EBA observes significant variation in the prudential treatment of OFIs (e.g. consumer and corporate lenders and securitisation vehicles) under national law. Although the EBA does not make any specific recommendations at this stage as to the scope of individual prudential regulation under EU law, the Authority notes the need to continue its monitoring work, including in conjunction with the European Systemic Risk Board (ESRB) as part of the annual shadow banking monitoring exercises.

Press release

Opinion

Report



© EBA


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment