23 June 2015

独ビーレフェルト大学フランツ・マイヤー教授、OMT（国債購入プログラム）に関する欧州裁判所の判決について、ドイツ憲法裁判所との根本的な認識の相違に応えていないと論評

In January 2014, for the first time in its history, the German Federal Constitutional Court submitted several questions to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in Luxembourg and asked for a preliminary ruling. The questions had arisen within the framework of the OMT case, and the issue was whether or not the OMT (“outright monetary transactions”) programme announced by Mario Draghi, the head of the European Central Bank (ECB), is in compliance with the law of the European Union.

The OMT programme (which has become well-known because Draghi said “whatever it takes to preserve the euro” when he unveiled it) plays an important role in the stabilization of the euro area. It means that the European System of Central Banks will be empowered to engage in unlimited buying of government bonds issued by certain Member States if and as long as these Member States are simultaneously taking part in a European rescue or reform programme (under the EFSF ot the ESM). Hitherto the OMT has not been implemented. Nonetheless a suit contesting its legality was filed with the Federal Constitutional Court.

The European Court of Justice now had to decide whether or not the activities of the ECB were in compliance with European law. However, the ECJ had to take into account the prior assessment of the Federal Constitutional Court. In its submission the Federal Constitutional Court made it quite clear that it was of the opinion that there has been a violation of European law. But at the same time it did not exclude the possibility that the ECJ set up legal conditions for OMT in order to avoid a violation of European law.

Franz C. Mayer, Professor of European Law at the University of Bielefeld, was Counsel to the Federal Parliament in earlier cases on the Euro in Karlsruhe. He explains the ruling by the European Court of Justice and assesses the possible consequences.

To download the full interview, click below

© Bertelsmann Stiftung