But the report warns that if the UK wants to encourage flexibility from the EU, it will need to put forward a proposal that shows an appreciation of their concerns. If the Government fails to make any headway soon, it could be forced back to the binary choice it wants to avoid.
The report sets out three possible approaches based on precedents:
-
An Economic Area or ‘Bespoke Norway’: the UK broadly accepts Single Market rules and EU institutions but tries to negotiate a new arrangement on freedom of movement. The UK would have a voice on regulations but not a final say.
-
A Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area or ‘Reverse Ukraine’: the UK would be allowed to participate in the Single Market, but only in certain sectors where it met EU rules.
-
A Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement or ‘Canada plus’: Modelled on the EU-Canada Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), this would aim for better EU market access for UK service industries and go further in removing non-tariff barriers.
The report also puts forward a new model, which recognises the unique starting point of complete regulatory convergence:
-
The ‘regulatory partnership’ model: focused on processes and institutions for ‘managing divergence’.
The report warns that, whatever the preferred option of the Government, deep Single Market access always comes with strict obligations on rules and oversight. Ultimately, the UK will not be able to duck that fundamental choice the EU offers all its trading partners.
Full report
© Institute for Government
Key
Hover over the blue highlighted
text to view the acronym meaning
Hover
over these icons for more information
Comments:
No Comments for this Article