Follow Us

Follow us on Twitter  Follow us on LinkedIn
 

07 March 2013

ECON Committee: Economic governance "two pack" background note


This background note gives an overview of the basic components of the 'two pack', highlights how legislators changed the rules as originally proposed by the European Commission, and explains the main hurdles that had to be cleared before a deal could be reached.

The "two pack" is the latest piece of the EU's economic governance revamp. It joins other instruments such as the European Semester, the "six pack" and the Fiscal Compact in ensuring that the EU's economic and monetary union is less fragmented and that its component countries run fiscally sound policies.

What is the "two pack" about?

The two regulations build on what has already been agreed in the "Six Pack"  legislative measures. They strengthen the legal basis of the "European Semester" economic coordination process and enable the European Commission to get a clearer view of  how Eurozone countries are working to meet the fiscal targets set by the EU Stability and Growth Pact. They also lay down much clearer procedures for dealing with countries that are in severe difficulties or are receiving an EU bailout.

The first regulation will apply to all eurozone countries. Countries will need to present their draft budgets to the Commission at the same time each year (by 15 October) and the Commission will have the right to assess and, if necessary, issue an opinion on them. The Commission may also ask that these drafts be revised.  The draft regulation also proposes closer monitoring and reporting requirements for Eurozone countries in the Excessive Deficit Procedure. This will strengthen the "European Semester" process by providing clearer rules for acting on the reform recommendations made to each country in the spring.

The second regulation sets out explicit rules and procedures for enhanced surveillance of any Eurozone country in distress. It will be apply in three cases, to:

  • countries facing severe difficulties with regard to their financial stability (high debt/deficit levels, market speculation etc.),
  • those in receipt of financial assistance on either a precautionary basis or as part of a full-scale assistance programme, and
  • those that are winding down such assistance.

This regulation will provide a much more predictable way to deal with countries in severe difficulty, improve transparency, and establish mechanisms to ensure that austerity measures accompanying financial assistance do not kill off potential for recovery.

How does the "two pack" fit into the EU's economic governance system?

The EU's economic governance structure is now composed of three basic elements:

  • the European Semester for Economic Policy Coordination, which aims to allow the EU's economies to run in synch with each other (no wide macro-economic disparities, deficits below 3 per cent GDP etc),
  • the "six-pack" legislaton and the Fiscal Compact, which essentially strengthen the Stability and Growth Pact (SGP) and introduce macro-economic surveillance, and
  • the "two-pack" regulations, which will kick in both before the six-pack rules, so as to reveal potential  fiscal trouble earlier, and also after them, so as to provide a legal framework with which to accompany countries in severe difficulties.

Why the delay in approving the legislation?

The "two pack" regulations took 15 months to finalise, i.e. above the 9-10 month average for economic governance and financial services legislation over the past 3 years. This delay was primarily due to a shift in the political climate from the date the rules were first proposed to when they were ultimately adopted.  This change saw the left of centre become increasingly critical of the 'austerity only' approach to deal with the eurozone crisis.  . 

In the European Parliament, this change led to a centre-left/liberals rift with centre-right proponents of austerity. The main bone of contention was over whether the "two pack" should be restricted to rules for preventing excessive deficits and enforcing reforms in "programme countries" or whether it should also include mechanisms for solidarity among countries and public investment leading to their economic convergence. The configuration of coalitions provided no clear majority either way and much work was needed to achieve a compromise acceptable to all.

In negotiations, some Member States then proved particularly reluctant to include any reference to setting up a "debt redemption fund" and the Commission was not prepared to present a proposal for one by the end of 2013. Other issues to do with using the "two pack" to promote growth and investment were also contested by Member States.  In mid-December talks were suspended, particularly at the request of Socialist, Liberal and Green MEPs.

In mid-February, the Commission promised to set up a group of wise men to draw up recommendations for establishing a debt redemption fund and introducing eurobills (debt of maturities of less than a year).  It also made other commitments, inter alia to allocate financial resources to help countries carry out their structural reforms.  These commitments allowed negotiations to resume and a deal was struck some days later.

When will the "two pack" rules enter into force?

The two regulations will enter into force quite quickly, as they will apply directly, and hence do not need to be transposed into national laws. They are therefore likely to apply to the eurozone countries' national budgets of 2014 (i.e. first draft budgets submitted to Commission by 15 October 2013).

Full background note



© European Parliament


< Next Previous >
Key
 Hover over the blue highlighted text to view the acronym meaning
Hover over these icons for more information



Add new comment