|
Given possible incompatibilities between CESR Rule 24 on cold calling and the Distance Marketing Directive, the implementation of that Rule was not assessed. The group checked to what extent these Standards have been affected by the EU Directive on distance marketing of consumer financial services. The group also considered the work undertaken by CESR at Level 2 under the MiFID concerning, in particular, the issue of tied agents as provided for in Standard 19 in the review.
Furthermore, the Review Panel has taken note that the inclusion of areas such as compliance and internal control mechanism would be crucial for the assessment of practical implementation. At the same time the thin line between the mandate of CESR at Level 3 and the Commission’s prerogative rights relating to MiFID Level 1 and 2 measures has to be emphasised.