|
|
Need for further procedural safeguards
The proposal contains problematic features and loopholes that would lead to unnecessary and wasteful litigation in Europe. The proposal should not provide incentives to competitors, third-party investors and law firms to litigate against companies at the expense of consumers. It is imperative that the JURI Committee assesses and mitigates these risks.
Business community welcomes the efforts made to strengthen principles such as the loser pays rule; the prohibition of punitive damages; and the admissibility criteria for compensation claims.
However, these important safeguards must be applicable to all collective claims, and not just to a sub-set of claims (such as third-party funded claims).
The text is still missing safeguards that need to be clearly stated, and which should apply to all claims. They include, for example:
These and other safeguards serve the purpose of balancing the interests of claimants and defendants and ensuring that compensation truly reaches the affected consumers.
Qualified entities
Due to their central role, the criteria to become a qualified entity are among the most important elements of this proposal. They are set to avoid abuses and even fraud. Appropriate criteria must apply equally to all qualified entities, including those entities already certified under pre-existing national representative actions laws.
Weak EU-level criteria would undermine those Member States’ legal systems that already provide stricter criteria to become a qualified entity. Business community strongly suggests additional common criteria applicable, inter alia, around: